Alaska Politics Blog

This is the place to talk about Alaska politics, state, local, national. Public life in the Last Frontier has never been more interesting -- Sarah Palin, a new governor, a new Anchorage mayor, the political corruption investigation, the usual hardball Alaska politics. Come here for news, tidbits and information, and join the discussion. We encourage lively debate, but please keep it civil and stay on point. Don't use profanity, make crude comments or attack other posters. Posts that violate the Terms of Use will be deleted. Repeat offenders will lose their ability to post comments.

Erika Bolstad

Erika Bolstad covers Alaska issues, including the congressional delegation, from Washington, D.C., for McClatchy Newspapers. Before joining the bureau in 2007, she spent seven years as a reporter at the Miami Herald, where she covered politics, government and the state legislature. E-mail Erika at ebolstad@adn.com.

Sean Cockerham

Sean Cockerham writes about Alaska state politics. He's worked for the ADN in Anchorage and Juneau, covered the legislature for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, and covered Washington state politics for the Tacoma News Tribune. E-mail Sean at scockerham@adn.com

Kyle Hopkins

Kyle Hopkins covers rural affairs, general assignments and politics for the ADN. He covered the 2006 campaign for governor, has blogged extensively about Alaska politics, covered Anchorage city government and was a reporter based in the Mat-Su. He grew up in Southeast Alaska and previously wrote for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner and Anchorage Press. E-mail Kyle at khopkins@adn.com and also find him on our rural Alaska blog, The Village.

David Hulen

David Hulen, the ADN's state and local news editor, is responsible for political coverage. He has been an editor and reporter at the ADN for more than 20 years. E-mail David at dhulen@adn.com

SECTION

Alaska political corruption

The FBI raided state legislature offices in Aug. 2006, and the fallout since has been epic in Alaska's political world.

Poll says Miller has six-point lead on McAdams - 9/1/2010 1:18 pm

Berkowitz comments on Murkowski's loss, takes shot at Parnell - 9/1/2010 12:41 pm

Miller statement on winning the GOP Senate nomination - 8/31/2010 8:24 pm

The count - 8/31/2010 10:47 am

The Senate race - 8/30/2010 12:54 pm

Miller campaign alleges possible vote tampering and wants state troopers posted at elections offices (updated) - 8/30/2010 11:49 am

Libertarians to Murkowski: No dice - 8/30/2010 9:15 am

Poll: There's a "glimmer of hope" for Democrats in the Senate race - 8/30/2010 8:09 am

Libertarians meet on Murkowski - 8/29/2010 9:18 pm

(UPDATED: Trooper Q&A) Senate candidate Joe Miller involved in three-car accident - 8/27/2010 3:01 pm

Another poll this weekend... - 8/27/2010 1:51 pm

UPDATED: Joe Miller likens Murkowski post-election scenario to that of "the oldest profession" - 8/27/2010 1:09 pm

"I have free speech!" (UPDATED) - 8/27/2010 10:18 am

Stevens to be buried at Arlington cemetery - 8/27/2010 7:23 am

Do Democrats have a chance in the Senate race? Pollsters will be inquiring this weekend. - 8/26/2010 2:33 pm

Murkowski gets some ballot counting legal help from the NRSC - 8/26/2010 12:13 pm

Lawmakers irked they're not allowed to speak during offshore drilling forum - 8/25/2010 6:20 pm

Murkowski: wait until the absentees are counted before writing her off (updated) - 8/25/2010 11:59 am

Democrats appear ready to take on Miller - 8/25/2010 11:11 am

Cornyn: "This seat will remain in Republican hands this November" - 8/25/2010 6:21 am

Will Ballot Measure 2 swing other elections? Plus, how's Parnell feel about Palin? - 8/24/2010 7:47 pm

The Palin effect - 8/24/2010 3:01 pm

UPDATED: Murkowski health care amendment fails

Comments (0) |

From Erika Bolstad in Washington D.C. --

The Senate voted 41-59 against Sen. Lisa Murkowski's amendment, only the second to be voted on as the Senate begins consideration of its version of a health care overhaul bill.

Murkowski's amendment would have banned the government from using guidelines from the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force to deny coverage. It would have applied to private insurers and government insurance plans. The Republican-backed amendment aimed at guidelines the task force released last month calling for pushing back the age and frequency at which women get screened for breast cancer.

Note that the Department of Health and Human Services funds the task force, but it makes its decisions independently from the federal agency. Also, when it was developing its recommendations, cost was not a consideration, only scientific evidence. The task force is "prohibited from considering costs when they make guidelines," the New York Times reported last month.

The Senate on Thursday did vote 61-39 to pass a competing amendment sponsored by Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md. That amendment allows a woman's doctor to determine whether mammograms are medically necessary. If so, it would require insurers to cover the screenings.

Also, Sen. Mark Begich, a Democrat, split ways with his Republican counterpart, Murkowski. Begich voted against her amendment and for the Mikulski version.

By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.