
Paulette Simpson lives in Juneau where she has been active in Republican politics.
A not so capital argument
- 11/11/2009 9:02 pm
Since when does "lucrative" mean losing money?
- 10/31/2009 1:51 pm
Centuries
- 10/23/2009 11:09 am
Trust, but verify
- 10/12/2009 7:10 pm
What if they held an election and nobody showed up?
- 9/27/2009 9:17 pm
Notes from Orlando
- 9/18/2009 11:59 am
Rules matter
- 9/10/2009 6:17 pm
Remembrance and redemption (or how I learned to pray for the Kennedys)
- 8/30/2009 4:59 pm
Capital City Governor's Picnic
- 8/23/2009 12:08 pm
Fast ferry fiasco
- 8/15/2009 8:54 pm
Freedom is an Endless Meeting
- 8/9/2009 4:14 pm
Summer Reading
- 7/31/2009 10:15 am
Talking Tourism Part II
- 7/27/2009 9:49 pm
Talking tourism
- 7/22/2009 4:44 pm
Lights, cameras...
- 7/14/2009 6:38 pm
Welcome to the Hotel Alaska
- 7/9/2009 9:11 am
For Sarah
- 7/5/2009 5:52 pm
Change we should believe in
- 7/2/2009 9:18 am
Let it go
- 6/24/2009 10:35 pm
Running out
- 6/21/2009 8:54 pm
Kensington countdown
- 6/16/2009 10:46 am
Conflict industry
- 6/14/2009 11:38 am
full archive »
Freedom is an Endless Meeting
Posted by Paulette Simpson
Posted: August 9, 2009 - 4:14 pm
|
Like anyone who participates in the political process, it’s not possible to add up all the hours I‘ve spent attending meetings. So when I read a review of a book called Freedom is an Endless Meeting, I was intrigued by the title and picked it up. Written by Francesca Polletta and published in 2002 by the University of Chicago Press, the book is about how participatory democracy and community organizing have impacted progressive social movements in the U.S. The writing was dense and academic but the title, Freedom is an Endless Meeting, still resonates and whenever I hop on a teleconference or head off to a meeting, I think about it. It also crossed my mind when I read about the never-ending Assembly hearings at Loussac Library about Anchorage’s proposed gay rights ordinance. At the core of that debate were deeply held values about personal liberty and from the perspective of people on both sides of the issue, they were fighting for their freedom.
When Americans believe our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are threatened, most people are inclined to take some form of action. While some send e-mails or write letters to newspapers or government officials, it’s enough for most citizens to simply vote in elections. Of course, there are always those who stand on street corners or on the Capitol steps in protest and the few who go to the extremes - but most of us just go to meetings. It’s a public, pro-active and civilized way to express an opinion and participate in democracy. Whether it actually matters a lot or a little to the final outcome, there’s just something satisfying about showing up, asking good questions and telling the people in power what we think.
Conventional wisdom holds that power in politics comes via organized money and organized people. The election of Barack Obama set records for both money raised and volunteers mobilized and he entered office with plenty of power to spare. But this summer’s debate about the President’s health care legislation seems to be testing the limits of his personal power and appeal, and it’s taking a toll on his popularity as well. Freedom of speech (talk radio) is flourishing and even the mainstream media are beginning to ask tough questions.
Back in their home districts for townhall meetings during the August recess, Congressional leaders are being quizzed, challenged and hammered hard about “America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.” Our Alaska delegation will enter the fray this coming week and field questions from constituents. It will be worth a few more meeting hours to get some answers. What will this legislation cost and what will it do to our freedom?
By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.
@Nyx.CommentBody@