The Editor's Blog

Do you wonder why the newspaper did what it did, or didn't do what it didn't do? The editor's blog is where Daily News Executive Editor Patrick Dougherty answers your questions, responds to your complaints and generally explains the behavior of the Daily News. It's also where we post news about the paper and our company. Do you think we missed or mishandled important news, misused a photo or put the wrong headline on a story? Did you like something you found in the paper? Do you have problems with the website? Send questions to me at editorsblog@adn.com or post your comments online. I only ask that you be clear, concise and civil, to me and to your fellow commenters.

Contact: editorsblog@adn.com


Why shut off comments on Palin? - 11/6/2009 9:45 am

Using comment features - 8/19/2009 5:49 pm

McClatchy surprises Wall Street - 7/22/2009 9:21 am

Question on comments - 4/21/2009 9:35 am

Why so tough on comments? - 4/16/2009 2:30 pm

Note to our commenters - 4/10/2009 2:31 pm

Behind the Newspaper Negativists - 3/20/2009 9:25 am

The talk you won't hear from Dan Fagan on KFQD - 2/6/2009 10:00 am

Fourth quarter grim news for ADN parent, other media companies - 2/5/2009 1:58 pm

adn.com one of Top 30 newspaper websites in December - 1/22/2009 5:20 pm

Update on policing ADN blog comments - 1/21/2009 4:27 pm

For journalists, welcome news from the president - 1/21/2009 1:37 pm

Q&A about the changes in the business of the ADN - 1/20/2009 9:54 am

Q&A with Tony Hopfinger about online publishing - 1/20/2009 9:46 am

175 million page views and other adn.com stats - 1/16/2009 4:30 pm

On reader comments - 1/15/2009 3:16 pm

This comment is worth repeating . . . - 1/14/2009 11:58 pm

More from the Palin-Dougherty chronicles - 1/13/2009 5:03 pm

Here's an actual history of the "Trig Palin conspiracy" - 1/13/2009 12:43 pm

Trig story question from the Anchorage Press - 1/12/2009 10:48 pm

Full text of the Palin-ADN email exchange - 1/12/2009 12:50 pm

Gov. Palin's press office: 'There they go again?' - 1/8/2009 7:03 pm

Question on comments

Comments (0) |

Why do the various comment sections often have fewer comments than the number listed at the beginning?

I believe that's because the comment "counter" counts comments from users who have been blocked as well as those who haven't. So commenters who continue to post even after they've been blocked still get their comments counted. Also, comments that have been manually deleted by an ADN administrator may also continue to show up in the count.

Is it really that people are hitting the "abuse" button to eliminate comments that aren't flattering to Sarah Palin or is it a site malfunction?

It's not a software malfunction. If a comment collects enough abuse reports, it gets hidden and goes into a queue for review. That system works pretty well when the abuse reporting feature is used legitimately. What's been happening lately is that a very small group of Sarah Palin "defenders" have made a collective effort to hide comments unfavorable to the governor. When we see this in the review queue, we unhide those comments.

Also, sometimes I make a comment to an article and it won't post, but on a different article, my comment will post. Why is that?

I'm not aware of this. The most likely explanation is that you are having an occasional comment manually deleted for some reason. If you can post any comment, you are not blocked.

I see a lot of negative speculation about the causes of the aforementioned questions, but I would like to know straight from you what the reasons are.
Thank you for your time.

You're welcome. I'm happy to try to answer your questions and hear your suggestions for improvement.

Pat Dougherty


By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.