The Editor's Blog

Do you wonder why the newspaper did what it did, or didn't do what it didn't do? The editor's blog is where Daily News Executive Editor Patrick Dougherty answers your questions, responds to your complaints and generally explains the behavior of the Daily News. It's also where we post news about the paper and our company. Do you think we missed or mishandled important news, misused a photo or put the wrong headline on a story? Did you like something you found in the paper? Do you have problems with the website? Send questions to me at editorsblog@adn.com or post your comments online. I only ask that you be clear, concise and civil, to me and to your fellow commenters.

Contact: editorsblog@adn.com


Why shut off comments on Palin? - 11/6/2009 9:45 am

Using comment features - 8/19/2009 5:49 pm

McClatchy surprises Wall Street - 7/22/2009 9:21 am

Question on comments - 4/21/2009 9:35 am

Why so tough on comments? - 4/16/2009 2:30 pm

Note to our commenters - 4/10/2009 2:31 pm

Behind the Newspaper Negativists - 3/20/2009 9:25 am

The talk you won't hear from Dan Fagan on KFQD - 2/6/2009 10:00 am

Fourth quarter grim news for ADN parent, other media companies - 2/5/2009 1:58 pm

adn.com one of Top 30 newspaper websites in December - 1/22/2009 5:20 pm

Update on policing ADN blog comments - 1/21/2009 4:27 pm

For journalists, welcome news from the president - 1/21/2009 1:37 pm

Q&A about the changes in the business of the ADN - 1/20/2009 9:54 am

Q&A with Tony Hopfinger about online publishing - 1/20/2009 9:46 am

175 million page views and other adn.com stats - 1/16/2009 4:30 pm

On reader comments - 1/15/2009 3:16 pm

This comment is worth repeating . . . - 1/14/2009 11:58 pm

More from the Palin-Dougherty chronicles - 1/13/2009 5:03 pm

Here's an actual history of the "Trig Palin conspiracy" - 1/13/2009 12:43 pm

Trig story question from the Anchorage Press - 1/12/2009 10:48 pm

Full text of the Palin-ADN email exchange - 1/12/2009 12:50 pm

Gov. Palin's press office: 'There they go again?' - 1/8/2009 7:03 pm

On reader comments

Comments (0) |

From Julie Wright, ADN managing editor --

We've had more complaints than usual lately about the hostile, crude and uncivil nature of comments on our stories and blog posts. I've spent more time than usual the past couple of days looking at the comments, and I have to agree that they've taken a turn for the worse. We've allowed a relatively free flow of ideas in hopes of stimulating a vigorous conversation about happenings in our state. The problem is that the comments now threaten to become so toxic that they kill any chance for civil, quality conversation among thoughtful readers.

So, beginning now, we are going to more strictly apply the rules that we've always had in place for comments on stories and blogs. When we see them, we will delete comments that are off topic, crude, attack other posters or are part of an apparent campaign to spam the boards with messages. We will ban users whose comments are particularly egregious, those who show a pattern of unwillingness to follow the rules and spammers. We will continue to allow critical comments about public figures and subjects of stories, but we will not allow crude comments about them or their personal lives. We will also block users who report abuse on others' comments just because they disagree with them.

In the past we've warned people and given them several chances to change their ways before blocking them, but under the current circumstances we're going to block users after their first violation of the terms of use if the violation is significant.

We hope this will result in more thoughtful comments and debates on our site. If it doesn't, we will consider killing or moderating the comments.

Send questions or comments to me at jwright@adn.com.


By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.