The Editor's Blog

Do you wonder why the newspaper did what it did, or didn't do what it didn't do? The editor's blog is where Daily News Executive Editor Patrick Dougherty answers your questions, responds to your complaints and generally explains the behavior of the Daily News. It's also where we post news about the paper and our company. Do you think we missed or mishandled important news, misused a photo or put the wrong headline on a story? Did you like something you found in the paper? Do you have problems with the website? Send questions to me at editorsblog@adn.com or post your comments online. I only ask that you be clear, concise and civil, to me and to your fellow commenters.

Contact: editorsblog@adn.com


Why shut off comments on Palin? - 11/6/2009 9:45 am

Using comment features - 8/19/2009 5:49 pm

McClatchy surprises Wall Street - 7/22/2009 9:21 am

Question on comments - 4/21/2009 9:35 am

Why so tough on comments? - 4/16/2009 2:30 pm

Note to our commenters - 4/10/2009 2:31 pm

Behind the Newspaper Negativists - 3/20/2009 9:25 am

The talk you won't hear from Dan Fagan on KFQD - 2/6/2009 10:00 am

Fourth quarter grim news for ADN parent, other media companies - 2/5/2009 1:58 pm

adn.com one of Top 30 newspaper websites in December - 1/22/2009 5:20 pm

Update on policing ADN blog comments - 1/21/2009 4:27 pm

For journalists, welcome news from the president - 1/21/2009 1:37 pm

Q&A about the changes in the business of the ADN - 1/20/2009 9:54 am

Q&A with Tony Hopfinger about online publishing - 1/20/2009 9:46 am

175 million page views and other adn.com stats - 1/16/2009 4:30 pm

On reader comments - 1/15/2009 3:16 pm

This comment is worth repeating . . . - 1/14/2009 11:58 pm

More from the Palin-Dougherty chronicles - 1/13/2009 5:03 pm

Here's an actual history of the "Trig Palin conspiracy" - 1/13/2009 12:43 pm

Trig story question from the Anchorage Press - 1/12/2009 10:48 pm

Full text of the Palin-ADN email exchange - 1/12/2009 12:50 pm

Gov. Palin's press office: 'There they go again?' - 1/8/2009 7:03 pm

This comment is worth repeating . . .

Comments (0) |

udub wrote on 01/13/2009 10:40:16 PM:

Pat,

Here is the thing. At this point, the main group of people who would be targeted by the Palin's submitting further proof are the conspiracy theorists, the majority of whom are the ones flooding your newspaper's e-mails and comment sections. However, if you read in detail, as I have, the messages written on the conspiracy web sites, the level of acceptable proof for these people is well beyond birth certificates and doctor statements. The level of distrust in any officical documents, and the certainty of their beliefs, has resulted in many of them stating that NOTHING can be submitted as proof that will persuade them now. NOTHING!!!!!!

So frankly, if a story was done that had additional cooperation from the Palin's invloving a birth certificate, medical records, doctor/eyewitness statements and such, your target audience would be mostly unmoved by the results. Everything would just be claimed to be tampered with or coerced. They are in the classic conspiracy bubble.

Udub:

You make an excellent point. We knew that if we did a story on this subject, and all it did was recap the existing public record, the conspiracy believers would still believe, and the conspiracy doubters would still doubt.

We may have been naive to think we could gather information definitive enough to get beyond that point, but we couldn't know for sure until we actually did the reporting.

It was with your point in mind that we asked to talk in greater detail to the governor and her doctor. You may well be correct that no level of proof would have ever satisfied the conspiracy proponents, but we thought making the attempt was journalistically appropriate.

Pat Dougherty


  1     July 9, 2009 - 9:30pm | boling1525

Replica Watches

Hello

By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.