The Highliner

Commercial fishing is a bedrock industry in Alaska, and has been for more than a century. Every year scores of fishermen net millions of migrating salmon, challenge the icy Bering Sea to trap king crabs, lay miles and miles of baited hooks for halibut, and scoop up enough pollock for a zillion fish sticks. And when fishermen aren't out fishing, they're usually talking about fishing. That's what this blog is all about. Cast your net here for commercial fishing news and notes. And if you've got a bone to pick, post a comment.

About me:
I've pounded the commercial fishing beat for the Anchorage Daily News since 1999. I hail originally from Tennessee. I've never fished commercially, but I've spent much time as a journalist aboard boats and inside fish-processing plants. Of course, I'm a big consumer of Alaska seafood. One of my favorites: canned sockeye.

Contact Wesley Loy at wloy@adn.com.


A fisherman vice president? - 8/29/2008 1:20 pm

Madsen loses bid for state House - 8/27/2008 3:12 pm

EPA fines another processor - 8/27/2008 10:24 am

Breaking news: Partial settlement in Exxon case - 8/26/2008 6:44 pm

Homer man charged with sablefish violation - 8/25/2008 10:00 am

Kodiak cutter crew boards Japanese vessel - 8/23/2008 5:17 pm

Salmon eaters, beware tapeworms - 8/22/2008 7:51 pm

American Seafoods lets catfish go - 8/22/2008 6:04 pm

Pebble and Bristol Bay’s salmon defenders - 8/22/2008 10:24 am

American Seafoods gets bigger - 8/18/2008 7:38 pm

MSC replies to state on 'client' status - 8/13/2008 1:16 am

Scale scandal - 8/13/2008 12:22 am

Court commands more delay in Exxon case - 8/12/2008 11:49 pm

Skipper accepts plea in vessel grounding - 8/7/2008 5:01 pm

Southeast seiners reduce their ranks - 8/6/2008 2:58 pm

Young defenders - 8/6/2008 2:16 pm

UFA: Stevens ‘innocent until proven guilty’ - 8/1/2008 3:45 pm

‘The tragedy of Sen. Stevens’ - 7/30/2008 1:49 pm

What’s fishy about Stevens indictment - 7/29/2008 11:58 am

A bit more on Aleutians king crab - 7/27/2008 12:29 am

Aleutians king crab deal announced - 7/27/2008 12:00 am

Brothers lose liberty, boat for halibut scheme - 7/25/2008 10:56 am

House also exempts fishing boats from 'silly' pollution permit requirement

The U.S. House of Representatives today joined the Senate in passing legislation to exempt owners of many commercial fishing boats from having to obtain Clean Water Act pollution permits.

The exemption is good for two years.

The legislation now goes to President Bush, who is expected to sign the legislation.

Here's a House press release with comments from Rep. Don Young of Alaska:


NEWS RELEASE

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

July 22, 2008

House Approves Pair of Bills to Prevent Excessive Regulation of Fishing Vessels, Commercial Vessels & Recreational Boats

Washington, DC – The U.S. House of Representatives today approved bills to ensure that millions of recreational boaters, fishermen and small commercial vessel operators will not be newly subjected to massive fines for the normal operation of their vessels.

The House passed the Clean Boating Act of 2008 (S. 2766) and another bill (S. 3298), under suspension of the rules. The Clean Boating Act provides a narrow Clean Water Act exemption for incidental discharges during the normal operation of recreational vessels. S. 3298 establishes a two-year moratorium on the pending requirement for all fishing vessels and small commercial vessels to obtain permits for similar incidental discharges. Both bills, which had identical companion bills in the House, are now cleared for the President’s signature.

“The Clean Boating Act will prevent America’s 16 million recreational boaters from being subject to federal fines of up to $32,500 per day for discharges, including rain that falls on the decks of their boats, and release of water from a marine sink or shower,” said Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Subcommittee Ranking Member Steve LaTourette (R-OH), who introduced the House version of the legislation, H.R. 5949, also called the Clean Boating Act of 2008. “This is a commonsense solution to the present situation which has been forced upon us by a single federal judge from Northern California. For more than 30 years, these discharges have not been classified as pollutants, and this bill will protect the original intent of the law.”

The Clean Water Act requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the discharge of any pollutant into navigable waters. However, in 1977 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exempted ‘discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel’ from that permit requirement. Court rulings in 2005 and 2006 determined that EPA had exceeded its authority when it granted this exemption and ordered that the regulatory exclusion for discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessel be revoked as of September 30, 2008. Without today’s Congressional action, recreational boaters, fishermen and small commercial operators would be unnecessarily subjected to penalties under the Clean Water Act.

“The court ruling that would require EPA permits for the incidental discharge of even rain water from recreational and commercial fishing vessels was silly and I am pleased that we are able to fix this problem,” said U.S. Rep. Don Young (R-AK). “In a state like Alaska, where fishing is one of our biggest industries, such a ruling could be detrimental to our entire economy. While I would have preferred legislation that treats recreational and commercial fishing vessels in the same manner, this package of bills will ensure, at least for the next two years, that commercial fishing vessels are not required to obtain EPA discharge permits for incidental discharges which have never been shown to cause significant harm to the marine environment. When the EPA shows that there is no harm, I expect Congress to act swiftly to clarify that no EPA permits are necessary for incidental discharges from commercial fishing vessels.”

“The Clean Water Act never intended for recreational boats to be forced to comply with an extensive federal permitting process,” said U.S. Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI). “The Clean Boating Act represents a compromise with Senate leaders which will ensure that millions of recreational boat owners do not need to acquire an EPA permit before heading out on the water.”

“Like many, the decision by a federal court in 2006 to require all 16 million vessels in the United States to obtain permission from the EPA to operate their boat came as an unpleasant surprise to me,” said U.S. Rep. Henry Brown (R-SC). “Today, however, both the House and Senate did the right thing and set up environmentally responsible exemptions and standards for incidental discharges from recreational boats. This measure will prevent the thousands of recreational boaters who enjoy the waters of my district, as well as millions of others, from obtaining a permit or being subject to costly fines. Additionally, it sets up standards that ensure the protection of our environment.”

While the Clean Boating Act provides an exemption for recreational boaters, S. 3298 provides a two-year moratorium for requiring discharge permits for all fishing vessels and other commercial vessels under 79 feet.

“S. 3298 will exempt small commercial vessels and all fishing vessels from obtaining EPA permits for two years while the agency studies the nature and impacts of discharges that are normal to the operation of these vessels,” LaTourette said. “Following the submission of the required report, Congress will have better tools to determine if these discharges should be regulated or exempted, as will be the case for recreational vessels.”

“These bills are an important and significant first step. Our commercial fishing industry is suffering from increased fuel costs, catch limitations and the economic slump,” said U.S. Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ). “At a time when our economy is experiencing a downturn, it is critically important Congress approve legislation that will protect both the recreational and commercial boating industries, and the millions of jobs they support.”

“Enactment of these bills will carry out an agreement made with Transportation Committee Chairman Oberstar to address the entire scope of vessels that will be impacted by the pending EPA permit program,” LaTourette added.

The Clean Boating Act also requires EPA to develop reasonable and practicable management practices to mitigate the adverse impacts that may result from discharges from recreational vessels. In addition, the legislation requires EPA to develop performance standards for management practices based on the class, type, and size of vessel.


login or register to post comments

  4     July 27, 2008 - 7:36pm | chinnook

silly laws

I think when You wash off the deck of Your boat and the water goes into the water via scuppers , or when rainwater falls on Your boat and is released through the scuppers and this is deemed illegal than that is a silly law.Or when a wet net comes up and the water runs off the deck into the sea ,It would be hard to prevent that.
There are so many regulations on commercial fishing now , and such high operating cost ,It is very hard to stay in business . I am sure putting us out of business is the goal of the enviromental groups that suggest these regulations

  3     July 23, 2008 - 10:17am | njalo99

hypocrites

fisherman want more legislation for mining companies but not themselves, mabe we should just label cw4 as excessive or just "silly" and get it off the ballot this August

  2     July 23, 2008 - 2:11am | Sheridan_Sheraton

Bush Agenda...

Exxon Valdez gets a longline drum.

  1     July 22, 2008 - 6:06pm | msvens

new boat rules

It would be nice to know which environmental group first brought this lawsiut up. They all say they are friends of fishermen but I did not see them trying to help with an exemption.