Alaska Politics

This is the place to talk about Alaska politics -- state, local, national. Public life in the Last Frontier may never have been more interesting than right now -- the broad and still-evolving corruption investigation, a big election, a popular governor, powerful members of Congress under scrutiny, and the usual hardball Alaska politics. Come here for news, tidbits and information, and join the discussion. Keep your comments civil and on point. Avoid personal attacks. Do not use profanity. Posts that violate the Terms of Use will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be banned.


Kyle Hopkins

Kyle Hopkins writes about Anchorage city government and politics. He covered last year's campaign for governor, and has blogged extensively about Alaska politics for the past year. He grew up in Southeast Alaska and was a reporter at the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner and Anchorage Press. E-mail Kyle at khopkins@adn.com

Sean Cockerham

Sean Cockerham writes about Alaska state politics. He spent three years based in Juneau for the Daily News before joining the Tacoma News-Tribune two years ago to write about Washington state politics. He went to Iraq twice for the News Tribune, and previously wrote about Alaska government and politics for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. Now he's back in Anchorage. E-mail Sean at scockerham@adn.com

Erika Bolstad

Erika Bolstad covers Alaska issues, including the congressional delegation, from Washington, D.C., for McClatchy Newspapers. Before joining the bureau this summer, she spent seven years as a reporter at the Miami Herald, where she covered politics, government and the state legislature. E-mail Erika at ebolstad@adn.com.

Palin spokeswoman: Kopp never told governor about reprimand (Updated with comments from lawmakers) - 7/24/2008 4:03 pm

Legislative Council to meet; Monegan on agenda? - 7/24/2008 2:40 pm

Metcalfe on the air - 7/24/2008 11:06 am

TransCanada still looking for federal help - 7/24/2008 10:52 am

Wall Street Journal on Stevens, Young - 7/24/2008 4:40 am

Rep. Meyer – TransCanada supporter? - 7/23/2008 11:57 pm

$1,200 rebate clears first committee - 7/23/2008 11:36 pm

Smile! - 7/23/2008 2:00 pm

National Dems like Begich's chances - 7/23/2008 1:33 pm

House passes TransCanada license – again - 7/23/2008 1:03 pm

What Kopp said - 7/22/2008 8:19 pm

Palin responds to "Latest round of falsehoods" - 7/22/2008 4:59 pm

Kopp: "I am not a sex harasser" - 7/22/2008 3:50 pm

Kopp to talk about Kenai years - 7/22/2008 2:53 pm

Cowdery resigns as Legislative Council chair - 7/22/2008 2:33 pm

T. Boone Pickens on ANWR - 7/22/2008 2:28 pm

How far would those $1,200 checks go in covering increased fuel prices? - 7/22/2008 11:47 am

Show and tell on ANWR - 7/22/2008 10:34 am

Poll chatter - 7/22/2008 8:48 am

Monegan speaks - 7/21/2008 6:05 pm

Palin investigator expected - 7/21/2008 1:36 pm

Pipeline issue marches on - 7/21/2008 1:23 pm

Polls

From Sean Cockerham in Anchorage --

The liberal web site Daily Kos has commissioned some more polling on Alaska's Congressional races and Democrats like what they see.

The poll, done by the nonpartisan firm Research 2000, shows Ethan Berkowitz over Don Young 50-40 in the House race and Mark Begich over Ted Stevens 48-43 in the Senate race.

Looks like the poll didn't include any of the other candidates in the Senate and House races-- like Sean Parnell, Diane Benson and Ray Metcalfe.

Daily Kos puts the margin of error at plus or minus 4 percent.

You can read more about the poll here.

This follows a Hays Research poll earlier this month that had Young over Sean Parnell 45 to 42 percent among Republicans in the House primary (a commenter rightly notes Hays didn't include independents in the poll.) That same Hays poll put Gabrielle LeDoux at 2 percent in the primary race.

Any other polling firms out there have numbers that contradict these findings? Send e'm our way and I'll add them to the blog.


login or register to post comments

  5     May 17, 2008 - 11:52am | akjustice2day

More Tomfoolery by the Democratic party

The leadership of the Democratic Party are promoting their crooked actors against honest candidates in their US House and US Senate races. The party should not favor and financially support one candidate over another in the primary. That's the job of the voters. I support many Democratic candidates, but I do NOT support the unethical and corrupt acts of the Democratic Party. I hope that Alaskans recognize the gamemanship of the Democratic Party and support the two ethical candidates running: Ray Metcalfe and Diane Benson. It makes no sense to elect more corrupt politicians to replace the corrupt ones we're preparing to toss out of office.

  May 17, 2008 - 1:42pm | chilcoot

Can I Have a Sip of That?

Cuz whatever it is, it sounds very fun.

  4     May 16, 2008 - 11:52pm | robindevoe

Parnell will crush Young in the primary

And then Berkowitz will have one hell of a hard time beating Palin-endorsed Parnell in the General. Sad but true.

  3     May 16, 2008 - 8:54pm | akmooster

begich vs stevens...

what a sham. where is the high ground here d's? Our crook can beat your crook?
How about some fresh air for a change? How about neither crook? How about Ray Metcalfe? Let's put some ethics and honesty in Washington.

  May 17, 2008 - 6:05am | fnord

>

<

  2     May 16, 2008 - 11:19am | gregmatt

Republican Congressional Primary

The Hays poll that had the Young-Parnell-Ledoux horserace at 45-42-2 is skewed. It only included registered and self-identified Republicans. I bet if you include independents who'll vote in the R primary, Parnell's numbers will skyrocket.

  May 16, 2008 - 11:25am | rfn

Include the Democrat Party members

will defect, for a day, to vote in the Republican primary for what they perceive to be the weakest candidate and it'll be ever more grotesque.

What's amazing is that any party member votes in his/her own "real" party's primary.

We could double voter turnout if Republican and Democrat primaries were held a week apart...allowing ample time for any voter to re-register twice.

  May 16, 2008 - 3:15pm | niklake

vote early, vote late, vote often, eh?

what a concept! I love it.

The main problem with the AK primary for National elections, is that it is so friggin' late. The winner has only nine weeks to campaign against an incumbent.

Phil Munger

  1     May 16, 2008 - 10:08am | tommcgrath

Wish versus Poll

This is, as you said, a liberal polling organization with a very narrow question identifying the Republican and the Democrat. Why didn't they ask about Parnell versus Berkowitz? I think the Democrats are wishing for the poll to come true. Sounds like poll results Moore would have or construe.

  May 16, 2008 - 11:31am | blue_in_AK

I agree with you...

And I believe he was wrong not to include Diane Benson, as well. For some reason, Kos has chosen to focus solely on Berkowitz as the presumptive Democratic candidate here, barely mentioning Benson, who achieved such remarkable results in 2006. I have heard that Markos personally contributed $1,000 to Berkowitz's campaign in the first quarter and has been drawing in large donations from his readers through giving the mistaken impression that it is purely a Young versus Berkowitz race.

I find this very disingenuous on his part, and I think these poll results should therefore be taken with a grain of salt. At this point, it would seem that any given nominee could handily defeat Don.

  May 16, 2008 - 4:07pm | chilcoot

It Is Young vs. Berkowitz

Diane Benson certainly has her supporters, but there's very few of them relative to Adam Berkowitz supporters.

Nearly every vote that Benson got in 2006 came not from people who like Benson but from people who dislike Young.

The single most likely battle this fall will be Young vs. Berkowitz.

  May 16, 2008 - 5:45pm | celtic_diva_ak

No...

...Young will be done in the primary.

I want to see the polling on who will do better against Sean Parnell. Anyone?

  May 16, 2008 - 5:12pm | Smeece

Right

Benson got 40% of the vote in 2006, mainly because she isn't Don Young (almost anyone could poll 36% - 40% against Young, as has been demonstrated every two years since 1973). Nothing has really changed; so, there is nothing that would lead one to believe that Benson is a more viable candidate in 2008 than she was in 2006. Berkowitz will win the primary; if he goes up against this year's version of a significantly weaker Don Young, he has a chance (but see what has happened historically to Democrats); Parnell would be a different story. But it's really too early to make any solid predictions.

  May 16, 2008 - 5:15pm | rfn

Historically

The Democrat Party allows people to exhaust themselves trying with all their heart and soul to win against incredible odds. Then when the odds changed? Throw 'em under the bus! Dukakis. Kerry. Mondale. I guess Diane shouldn't be surprised.....

  May 17, 2008 - 6:16pm | blue_in_AK

Just a little pet peeve of mine.

It's DemocratIC party. Unlike Republican which is both noun and adjective, Democrat is purely a noun.

(I know, picky, picky.)

  May 17, 2008 - 9:46pm | rfn

The Democratic Party was the party

of Harry S Truman; the last president of any party to understand that wars are to be won and how to win one.

Sometime around the time Mondale dumped Eagleton the name was lost and it became The Democrat Party, sans "democratic" principles.

Case in point: Diane works her heart out to best Don Young and, just when she has a chance, The Democrat Party throws her under the bus. Now if it truly were The Democratic Party of days of yore, she'd be the candidate by acclaim and there wouldn't be any need for a primary.

Nope. The name "Democrat Party" has been earned.

  May 19, 2008 - 8:56pm | seewhy

rfn......

snipped from a david sirota column:
'The latter, in fact, was precisely how the epithet “Democrat Party”—as opposed to “Democratic Party”—was coined. As the language-obsessed William Safire documented 24 years ago in a New York Times column, the term “Democrat Party” was created by Republican leaders in the mid-20th century to imply that their opponents—many bigoted segregationists and machine pols—were, in fact, undemocratic.'
sounds to me as if those responsible for earning the name were the dixie dems who all became republicans in the '60s and early '70s, eh.

  May 20, 2008 - 4:50pm | rfn

Just one of the many

linguistic triumphs we may attribute to Mr. Safire!

The English language would be so greatly diminished were his contributions omitted.

Were some future Democrat president to nuke Iran, in the spirit of Harry S Truman, I'd joyfully resume the use of "ic"!

  May 18, 2008 - 11:55pm | chilcoot

?

Wow, Eagleton was dropped by Mondale too? I thought McGovern's decision to drop him was bad enough.

  May 19, 2008 - 11:39am | rfn

Eagleton was dropped

by every Democrat alive.

The only argument they have is over who was fastest and most disdainful.

Funny part of it was that Eagleton was the only one among them who had a certificate proving he was sane.

Those who were too young to experience it, pay attention to what the Alaska Democrat Party is doing to Diane. Just doin' what comes naturally....

  May 18, 2008 - 10:16am | blue_in_AK

I understand your sentiment...

...and agree that the way the party has attempted to marginalize Diane and other more progressive candidates is pretty shameful. However, when I hear Democrat Party, I'm reminded of how the Republicans -- Rush, et al. -- use it as a pejorative, with the emphasis on the "rat" part, and as a lifelong member of the party, it just bothers me. It's a personal thing.

  May 18, 2008 - 10:23am | rfn

Think of it, then,

as a call to restore Democratic principles to The Democrat Party.

How bad has the situation become?

Most of today's "Democrats" have not the slightest idea of what the "S" in "Harry S Truman" stood for!

  May 18, 2008 - 5:17pm | blue_in_AK

It just stands for S, doesn't it?

I guess that makes me a real Democrat. :)

  May 18, 2008 - 5:29pm | rfn

Bingo!

Of course you're gonna get some arguments from a few semi-literates about that. The ones who always type it out as: "Harry S. Truman".