Inside Opinion

If you have questions about how the Daily News makes editorial decisions, this blog has the answers. Editorial page editor Matt Zencey and writers Frank Gerjevic and Rosemary Shinohara will discuss what they're working on, answer questions and ask your perspective on issues facing Alaska.


Matt Zencey

Matt Zencey joined the Daily News as an editorial writer in 1985 and was named editorial page editor in May 2007. He has won several. "Best editorial writing" awards from the Alaska Press Club and was a Nieman Fellow in Journalism at Harvard University. He lives on the west side of Anchorage, where he enjoys the best weather in town and easy access to the Coastal Trail. E-mail Matt at mzencey@adn.com

Frank Gerjevic

Frank Gerjevic has worked at the Daily News since 1978, where he's been sports editor, copy editor, reporter and columnist. He's been an editorial writer since 1998. He began his newspaper career with the Anchorage Times in 1975. E-mail Frank at fgerjevic@adn.com

Rosemary Shinohara

Rosemary Shinohara is an editorial writer who has lived most of her life in Alaska. She has spent most of her career as a reporter or editor at the Daily News. She covered construction of the Alaska oil pipeline, the Legislature, schools and urban affairs. She has also been an editor for NPR's All Things Considered, and has written for the Associated Press. E-mail Rosemary at rshinohara.com

Joe Contraire's latest, coming soon - 5/9/2008 2:41 pm

Sarcasm? Hah! A non-fan writes in.... - 5/9/2008 11:48 am

Who's accountable for ADN editorials? - 5/7/2008 11:14 am

Talk radio: Dittoheads vs liberals - 5/7/2008 11:01 am

More info and commentary on John McCain's health care 'plan' - 5/1/2008 6:29 pm

Join the dialogue on race and diversity - 4/30/2008 4:44 pm

How can our community as a whole combat prejudice and discrimination? - 4/30/2008 4:42 pm

What can an individual do about prejudice? - 4/30/2008 4:39 pm

Prejudice here - getting better or worse? - 4/30/2008 4:37 pm

Prejudice and discrimination: How are we doing in Anchorage? - 4/30/2008 4:36 pm

Not-so elevated discourse - 4/28/2008 4:20 pm

Elevated discourse - 4/28/2008 10:44 am

Yin and Yang - 4/25/2008 6:00 pm

UAA vs UAF - 4/24/2008 3:59 pm

Arctic Power demands retraction re Liddy - 4/23/2008 6:04 pm

Airport expansion vs. Kincaid trails - 4/23/2008 10:20 am

About the First Amendment - 4/23/2008 9:52 am

Irwin rips Exxon, partners on Point Thomson - 4/22/2008 5:25 pm

Tesche heads into the sunset - 4/22/2008 4:52 pm

Good words from Leonard Pitts - 4/22/2008 3:25 pm

Outside opinion invasion - 4/21/2008 5:26 pm

Denali: Not just a mountain anymore - 4/11/2008 1:39 pm

Airport expansion vs. Kincaid trails

From Rosemary Shinohara:

Anchorage International Airport has two projects proposed that would dampen the park experience of people hiking, biking or skiing in parts of Kincaid Park and the Tony Knowles Coastal Trail.

I wanted to let people know there's a meeting tonight (Wednesday) from 5 to 8 p.m. at the Kincaid chalet to talk about one of them, the idea of extending the east-west runway by 1,500 to 1,800 feet to the west.

The airport is beginning an environmental assessment of this project, which it says would reduce airfield congestion and delays taxiing.

It would mean planes flying lower over the coastal trail, and some changes to trails on the west side of Kincaid.

That project is on the near horizon. The airport is also revising its master plan, and will hold a public meeting May 21 as the West Coast International Inn on it. There is an expansion proposal in the master plan that could mean relocating a piece of the coastal trail.


login or register to post comments

  2     April 23, 2008 - 12:22pm | rfn

Seems rather foolish

to spend much more money on expanding a land-locked airport.

Might be better to get on with making a start on a new airport across the inlet, away from the congested airspace (Lake Hood, Merrill Field) and where enough land could be set aside to have not just long enough runways for the new generations of Mega-transports but also for ground facilities. Canada is already working toward a gigantic new airport intended to make Ted Stevens Airport obsolete. They have a pretty good leg-up with nearby port facilities and a planned railroad extension to create a true intermodal hub.

With the AK railroad already poised to lay track to Port McKenzie and money available for port building (why expand an old one when a new one can be done more easily on readily available land?), isn't this the time to be looking ahead more than six months?

  1     April 23, 2008 - 8:37pm | TheSdog

Get ready

for the granola chompers to complain and impede progress.