Alaska Politics

This is the place to talk about Alaska politics -- state, local, national. Public life in the Last Frontier may never have been more interesting than right now -- the broad and still-evolving corruption investigation, a big election, a popular governor, powerful members of Congress under scrutiny, and the usual hardball Alaska politics. Come here for news, tidbits and information, and join the discussion. Keep your comments civil and on point. Avoid personal attacks. Do not use profanity. Posts that violate the Terms of Use will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be banned.


Kyle Hopkins

Kyle Hopkins writes about Anchorage city government and politics. He covered last year's campaign for governor, and has blogged extensively about Alaska politics for the past year. He grew up in Southeast Alaska and was a reporter at the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner and Anchorage Press. E-mail Kyle at khopkins@adn.com

Sean Cockerham

Sean Cockerham writes about Alaska state politics. He spent three years based in Juneau for the Daily News before joining the Tacoma News-Tribune two years ago to write about Washington state politics. He went to Iraq twice for the News Tribune, and previously wrote about Alaska government and politics for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. Now he's back in Anchorage. E-mail Sean at scockerham@adn.com

Erika Bolstad

Erika Bolstad covers Alaska issues, including the congressional delegation, from Washington, D.C., for McClatchy Newspapers. Before joining the bureau this summer, she spent seven years as a reporter at the Miami Herald, where she covered politics, government and the state legislature. E-mail Erika at ebolstad@adn.com.

About that PCE amendment - 8/7/2008 4:22 pm

House gives Senate something - 8/7/2008 3:36 pm

Is House about to bust a move? - 8/7/2008 3:18 pm

Tick, tick, tick - 8/7/2008 1:34 pm

The Metcalfe plan - 8/7/2008 12:29 pm

Judge establishes ground rules for Stevens' trial - 8/7/2008 10:22 am

Palin on the ethics charge (UPDATED) - 8/6/2008 10:28 pm

Ethics complaint against Palin - 8/6/2008 6:13 pm

Senate challenges House on energy bill - 8/6/2008 6:06 pm

House eats cake - 8/6/2008 4:00 pm

"That comment went over poorly in Alaska..." - 8/6/2008 10:33 am

Benson from D.C. - 8/6/2008 10:12 am

"I think she would be a brilliant pick because she's a total fresh face." - 8/6/2008 9:14 am

‘Morphine and welfare payments’ - 8/5/2008 4:59 pm

Bush in Fairbanks pics - 8/5/2008 11:08 am

Nader on the ballot? - 8/5/2008 10:15 am

Young's legal expense fund - 8/5/2008 4:48 am

Speculation on Stevens' pension - 8/5/2008 4:09 am

Capitol fashion accessory - 8/5/2008 1:49 am

The House debate - 8/5/2008 1:11 am

TransCanada CEO tries to put out Exxon fire - 8/4/2008 9:13 pm

House debate tonight - 8/4/2008 8:09 pm

Pork attack

The AP takes a look at federal spending on Alaska, and the spotlight on Stevens, Young and Murkowski ...


By LARRY MARGASAK
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON -- When he was a keeper of the federal purse strings, Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska told another Republican senator who opposed the infamous "bridge to nowhere," ''I don't threaten people. I promise people."
His home-state GOP colleague, Rep. Don Young, was not to be outdone. Last month he told a fellow House member who opposed education money for native Alaskans: "There is always another day when those who bite will be killed, too, and I am very good at that. Those that bite me will be bitten back."
Stevens and Young may not be promising, threatening or biting anymore, now that both are under federal investigation.
The investigations _ and a questionable land deal that entangled the third member of Alaska's congressional delegation _ also may have ended a modern-day gold rush that sent billions of federal dollars to the state.
Alaska's entire delegation is under an ethical cloud, something congressional historians say is unprecedented:
-- Stevens is contending with an extraordinary FBI and IRS raid on his Girdwood, Alaska, home and a probe into his dealings with businessmen who oversaw remodeling of the house.
-- Young is the subject of a federal investigation that includes his campaign finance practices, and he has been chided by the leaders of his own party for his threatening comments. He was left off a House-Senate conference on an annual water resources bill that he had handled as a committee chairman.
-- Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced that she and her husband will sell back an undeveloped piece of riverfront property after a complaint to the Senate's ethics committee alleged the purchase was a sweetheart deal.
Stevens, 83, is the longest-serving Republican in Senate history _ having taken office in 1968. Young, 74, has been in office since 1973. Both face election next year.
"They aren't as bulletproof as they once were," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a group that tracks pet projects known as earmarks or pork-barrel spending. "The people are not going to be quite as afraid of taking on The Hulk or Don Young." ''The Hulk" is a reference to Stevens, who occasionally sports a tie with the image of the Incredible Hulk cartoon character.
No other delegation has delivered like Alaska's, using a combination of intimidating tactics and powerful positions _ especially when Republicans were in the majority through last year. Stevens headed the Senate Appropriations Committee. Young led the House Transportation Committee, making him the traffic cop for all road and mass transit projects.
More than 2,000 projects worth $7.5 billion have gone to Alaska since 2000, says Taxpayers for Common Sense. Alaska received a little over $1 billion in the 2005 highway bill.
A 2005-2007 study of earmarks by the group showed that Alaska _ ranked 47th in population _ has done far better than other states, when spending is calculated per person. Spending over the three-year period came to $4,311 per person in earmarked projects for Alaskans, while Hawaii was a distant second at $1,812. At the low end were the populous states of Texas, at $98 per person, and New York, $95 per person.
Part of the difference can be explained by Alaska's special needs, with its remote geography, rough terrain and extreme weather. But the clout of Stevens and Young also has played a huge role.
"There was a time when these were the gods in some ways, but it's a new world," said Bill Hoagland, a former Senate Appropriations Committee staff director under Stevens. "There are senators and congressmen who are new to the institution and don't have reason to be as scared as previous members. They don't have the same fear factor."
Still, Dr. Carl Shepro, a political science professor at the University of Alaska, said the investigations have not yet generated a public outcry against Stevens and Young in Alaska.
"They brought a lot of programs to the state. It will take a conviction to get large numbers of people against them," Shepro said.
"One of the things about Young that turns a lot of people off in D.C., and some people here, is the fact that he'll get in some people's faces." But most Alaskans appreciate that, he said. "A lot of voters think he's expressing individualism."
Federal authorities are scrutinizing Stevens' relationship with oil field services contractor Bill Allen, who helped oversee a renovation project that more than doubled the size of Stevens' Alaska home in 2000. Allen's company, VECO Inc., won tens of millions of dollars in federal contracts and officials were major political donors. Allen has pleaded guilty to bribing lawmakers in the state Legislature.
The Young probe, in part, involves his campaign finance practices, according to a law enforcement official who commented only on condition of anonymity. The investigation was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Former VECO CEO Allen held fundraisers called "the Pig Roast" for Young every August for 10 years.
Young's spokeswoman Meredith Kenny has declined to discuss the investigation.
Stevens says the interests of justice will be best served if he does not comment until after the investigation.
Murkowski says her land deal was "a judgment call that I made that allowed me and my husband to undergo a level of criticism that I believe is unfounded but has caused people to question me. I'm not willing to compromise that trust for any piece of property."
Murkowski had drawn criticism over her purchase _ located along the scenic Kenai River southwest of Anchorage on the Kenai Peninsula _ from a campaign contributor she called a lifelong family friend.
Hoagland, the former appropriations committee staff director under Stevens, said that even before the latest incidents, "the winds had already started to shift" away from Stevens and Young. It started, he said, with the defeat in late 2005 of the "bridge to nowhere" _ a $223 million project connecting Alaska's lightly populated Gravina Island to Ketchikan. It was shelved after it drew scorn from the media and the public.
Then, both men were left in the minority by last November's election results.
Hoagland added, "The congressional environment on earmarks, the minority status, and on top of that the black cloud that hangs over ... particularly Stevens will lessen the amount of funding he and Young can channel back to state of Alaska."
"But he is a tough fighter. I never underestimate Ted Stevens."


Some examples of special project appropriations going to Alaska, as compiled by the private group Taxpayers for Common Sense:
-- Alaska Fisheries Marketing Board. From its federal funds, the board gave Alaska Airlines a $500,000 grant. It was used, in part, to paint a Boeing 737 to look like a Chinook Salmon to promote the state's seafood.
-- The Alyeska Roundhouse received $450,000. The building is at the Alyeska ski resort in Girdwood, where Alaska Republican Sen. Ted Stevens has his home.
-- Money for six "Alternative Salmon Products." The University of Alaska received several of these earmarks, which included $450,000 for development of baby food containing salmon in 2006.
-- Alaska Christian College received $435,000 in 2005. The school had several dozen students at the time.
-- The National Archives and Records Administration received at least $2.25 million toward the purchase of an empty lot in Anchorage from two former Stevens business partners. The purchase cost was $3.5 million, allowing the former Stevens partners to more than double their investment.
-- The Alaska Botanical Garden received $300,000 over three years for expansion and renovation.
-- SpringBoard, an organization that helps Alaska businesses meet the needs of the Department of Defense, received $14 million the past two years.
-- $250,000 was appropriated to plan for the Alaska Statehood celebration, set for 2009.
--$1 million in 2005 went for mobile computers for police cars in Wasilla, Alaska, population 6,700.


login or register to post comments

  4     August 23, 2007 - 8:11am | BillPersons

Senator Stevens; Pork barrell

Send Senator Stevens to Alabama.
It would be great to have our tax dollars spent here
rather than the Middle East.
Alaskans should feel fortunate to have Senator Stevens
bringing THEIR money home.

  August 24, 2007 - 11:46am | leowassilie

Barrell of laughs

The dollars do come home.

Just ask the spouses and families of nearly 4,000 soldiers.

Ask Haliburton.

Ask Lockheed Martin.

  August 25, 2007 - 1:03am | edgefinder

Ask Chenega where all that

Ask Chenega where all that no-bid Uncle Theodore money is going.

Not an island in PWS.

  3     August 15, 2007 - 12:01pm | alaskaveteran

How come the Daily News

How come the Daily News didn't list any of the programs like funding for a new 911 system for Anchorage, fire prevention for southcentral, or cleaning up the creeks in Anchorage and restoring fish runs, or the Brother Francis Shelter for the homeless? No one tells you about funds to fix leaking fuel tanks that contaminate water, or running water for villages that otherwise use honey buckets. These so called national watchdog groups don't care about programs to immunize Alaska's kids, provide health care where none would otherwise exist, or install runway lights in communities that have none. They pick what they think are the most questionable projects and only share those half dozen out of hundreds of projects over the years that have benefitted our state and dozens that have helped Anchorage alone. I can understand the National groups that don't want Alaska to get any more federal tax dollars - but why would the Daily News play along?

  August 19, 2007 - 2:12pm | TheSdog

I hate to tell you this

but a lot of that is pork.

Pork does not mean something is unnecessary. It can also mean something that really is not the responsibility of the federal govt. Much of what you mention should be funded by private entities or local governments.

We live in a society where everybody wants a free ride. Let's get somebody else to pay for it. It drives us closer and closer to socialism every day. The founding fathers are somewhere right now shaking their heads at what we have become.

  August 15, 2007 - 12:30pm | rfn

Can you spell....

"agenda"?

  2     August 14, 2007 - 3:47pm | heman

How many Police cars does Wasilla have .?

Huh

  August 15, 2007 - 10:50am | staufen

Not enough

... to drive to the coast and arrest all the fishing cartel members who are taking $2 billion annually out of Alaska by illicit bookkeeping tricks ... a problem akin to the one of PPT versus Gross Government Take on Oil.

But we hope they fit one with fins and a propellor for the ex-mayor to use when the fisheries indictments come down and our US waters are free again...

Oh the point?! = Ted has repeatedly tucked away more billions of dollars in giveaways in fishery legislation via Appropriation Riders/bills than all the standard for-Alaska earmarked-pork combined for these past few years. The nefarious thing is that his fishery bills never have to list that $100's of millions went to a few coercive monopolists in a species allocation that they call "rationalization." These simple legislative phrases allot billions in perpetuity to Global Corporations who funnel just a wee bit back to Ted and Ben in campaign funds (lawyer fees and kickbacks) and consulting fees (outright bribes) respectively.

Sayonara.

  1     August 14, 2007 - 4:34pm | rfn

And so

we should immediately impose a state income tax and dedicate the entire proceeds to giving back the federal money so it can be given to a deserving "blue" state.

If that's not enough, perhaps a tax on "news" papers...possibly calculated by average daily weight. After all, the paper, ink and finished product are hauled over the roads paid for with all that pork. Flown to the bush on airports financed with yet more pork!

  August 15, 2007 - 10:52am | aprichard

Or Maybe

We could use the money to pay off the $3 trillion added to the national debt over the last 6 years by the Bush Administration and the Republican Congress.

  August 15, 2007 - 11:15am | rfn

So you DO want an immediate income tax!

I just knew someone would!

But labor under no mis-apprehension. Any money Alaska might "refund" would not go toward debt reduction. It would merely be redistributed to those deemed "more deserving".

  August 14, 2007 - 5:07pm | chilcoot

Not Funny

The above post is not funny.

  August 14, 2007 - 5:12pm | truthseeker

I agree.............

It is way too truthful.