The Trail : A blog on the 2006 Alaska governor's race by Kyle Hopkins

About the blog: The race to become Alaska's next governor is on and it's about to get muddy. Grab your boots and follow the Daily News along the winding campaign trail.

Contact: thetrail@adn.com

Blog : Alaska Politics

Happy trails - 11/8/2006 8:05 pm

Forty-two - 11/8/2006 8:01 pm

Election hangover - 11/8/2006 10:25 am

Tonight (updated) - 11/7/2006 12:18 pm

Full Moon - 11/6/2006 7:11 pm

Fishy photos? - 11/6/2006 12:08 pm

Smelly deal? - 11/5/2006 3:31 pm

Sunday best (part two) - 11/5/2006 3:18 pm

'It's going to be madness' - 11/4/2006 8:33 pm

Final push - 11/4/2006 8:26 pm

Ivan Moore - 11/4/2006 1:45 pm

Furrowed brow - 11/3/2006 2:20 pm

New poll (updated) - 11/3/2006 2:00 pm

Berkowitz - 11/3/2006 10:29 am

Predict the future - 11/2/2006 10:53 pm

Live debate (updated 9:37 p.m.) - 11/2/2006 8:19 pm

More on the e-mails - 11/2/2006 7:14 pm

Channel 7 debate (updated) - 11/2/2006 7:12 pm

Round two - 11/2/2006 4:20 pm

Read the e-mails - 11/1/2006 9:45 pm

TV debate tonight (updated) - 11/1/2006 11:02 am

Anchorage Rotary debate - 10/31/2006 4:58 pm

More on the e-mails

Comments (0) |

A little more on the e-mail chain debate that has both Palin and the Knowles campaign expressing outrage today.

The Knowles camp held a press conference before noon, with Knowles campaign manager Leslie Ridle, spokeswoman Patty Ginsburg, campaign rural coordinator Sarah Scanlan and Democratic former state Sen. Georgianna Lincoln.

As I noted earlier today – both sides are saying the other is playing the race card.

“Sarah Palin accused the Knowles staff of racism. This is a McCarthy-ite tactic of the lowest order,” Ginsburg said.

Later, Palin said the Knowles campaign, not her, was raising the race issue.

“When my opponent accused me of using race in this election, he did sink to a new low,” she said.

As they spoke, the Knowles supporters stood next to a giant copy of a transcript from yesterday’s Dan Fagan show, in which the first question posed to Knowles and Palin from the public was about Knowles mailers on rural issues:

...

Caller (to Palin): … “Tony’s mailing out mailers all over rural Alaska saying that you’re anti-Native, anti-subsistence and anti-rural …”

Knowles: “I didn’t … hey, there’s no anti-Native in that, let’s if you’re gonna ask the question, clean it up.”

Fagan: “Well give me an example Scott, of what you say is anti-Native.”

Knowles: “It doesn’t say that at all.”

Caller: “That’s what I’ve been … well, irregardless, what’s your position on that, and aren’t you’re married to a Yupik man of Yupik decent and, you know, are you anti subsistence?”

Palin: “Well, you know, I’ve seen the flier, yeah, that talks about … being, you know, anti-rural. I think what you’re referring to, though, the anti-Native e-mails that have come from at least one person on his campaign staff on the payroll there. Yeah, it’s pretty offensive …”

...

It’s important to note that Knowles seems to be talking about a campaign flier here at the beginning, while Palin is talking about the e-mail chain. Palin’s line about anti-Native e-mails coming from the campaign staff is a sticking point with the Knowles campaign.

(The Knowles camp also said they thought this call into the radio show was a plant from the Palin campaign, while Palin spokesman Curtis Smith says that’s not true.)

...

On the radio program, Palin also said: “… Yeah, it’s offensive to see that stream of e-mails being circulated around by a member of Tony Knowles’s staff on the campaign. Yeah, that’s kind of hurtful. But, um, no, I think that we need with our subsistence impasse that the state of Alaska has faced for all these years, we need to finally unite around this and resolve to resolve the issue.”

Fagan: “Well let me ask Gov. Knowles, do you have staff member issuing anti-Native…”

Knowles: “Absolutely not. That is just fabricated. It’s made up.”

Fagan: “What do you base that on Sarah?”

Palin: “Sarah Scanlan who is a name on those e-mails and your running mate ... your running mate’s campaign manager, one of the treasurers is Georgianna Lincoln. Those two names, Tony, on those circulated e-mails.”

...

Lincoln was an honorary chair of Ethan Berkowitz’s campaign for lieutenant governor during the primary. The Knowles camp says she’s now simply a supporter of the Knowles-Berkowitz ticket.

Scanlan is the campaign’s rural coordinator. Her name does appear in one of the e-mail chains that’s bouncing around. Scanlan’s e-mail is from Oct. 6, and it shows Scanlan sending out a list of questions that appeared on an Anchorage Press questionnaire. The list shows that Palin did not answer several rural-related questions.

Scanlan said at the press conference that she was simply responding to a request for information. The e-mail her name shows up on is not one of the more pointed e-mails that Palin has been talking about.

Those two e-mails are the ones that say “What color and where do you have to live to be important to this candidate?” and ask: “If Natives and 18 of the top businesses in Alaska aren't important to her (Palin), who is? Obviously, not Alaska Natives and their corporations.”

They were written by two women who Ginsburg and Ridle said they didn’t know.

As for Lincoln’s e-mail, it criticized Palin on her stance on subsistence and for not attending the Native Get Out the Vote candidate forum in Fairbanks. It was a reply to the e-mail that criticized Palin for not meeting with Native corporation CEOs. That earlier e-mail, not Lincoln's, said: “If Natives and 18 of the top businesses in Alaska aren't important to her, who is? Obviously, not Alaska Natives and their corporations.”

Lincoln's reply was then picked up by someone and sent along in a chain of responses.

Palin held her own press conference a few hours later. (I wasn’t there, but listened over the phone – albeit with a bad connection -- and talked to Palin later.) Part of Palin’s beef is that Lincoln appeared to be encouraging people to circulate the message that Natives aren’t important to her.

Palin read a passage from Lincoln’s e-mail: “Pass your note and others like them on to your friends ...”

Lincoln said she stands by her message and that she wasn’t calling Palin anti-Native, but looking to draw attention to the candidates’ stands on the issues.

Lincoln said: “I am offended that she (Palin) is using my name to say that I accused her of being anti-Native.”

She called on Palin to apologize to her.

Palin responded later in the day, after her own press conference, that she doesn’t have anything to apologize for.


Here’s a more complete transcript of the radio exchange, provided by the Knowles campaign today:

Caller: Yeah, hi, uh, Sarah. Tony’s mailing out mailers all over rural Alaska saying that you’re anti-Native, anti-subsistence and anti-rural….

Knowles: I didn’t…hey, there’s no anti-Native in that, let’s if you’re gonna ask the question, clean it up.

Fagan: Well, give me an example Scott, of what you say is anti-Native.

Knowles: It doesn’t say that at all.

Caller: That’s what I’ve been … well, irregardless, what’s your position on that, and aren’t you’re married to a Yupik man of Yupik decent and, you know, are you anti subsistence?

Palin: Well, you know, I’ve seen the flyer, yeah, that talks about, um, being, you know, anti-rural. I think what you’re referring to, though, the anti-Native emails that have come from at least one person on his campaign staff on the payroll there. Yeah, it’s pretty offensive because you’re exactly right I’m married to …

Knowles: No, no, wait a second, wait a second. You can’t get away with that saying anti-Native, anti-Native emails from a person on staff or anti- rural. It’s a factual thing that states out that you don’t support the constitutional amendment to protect subsistence. That’s a fact. You’ve stated it many times. The question, there’s two question marks: do you support tribes and do you support the Katie John decision? We don’t know so you can clear it up right here. Do you support tribes?

Palin: Absolutely.

Knowles: You do? So you support the millennium agreement that I initiated to support tribes? You do?

Palin: I do and we talked about that at AFN, Tony.

Knowles: And do you support the Katie John decision?

Palin: Tony, we talked about this at the AFN.

Knowles: No, we didn’t talk about it. So do you support Katie John?

Palin: Are you gonna answer Scott’s question, or was the question to me? He asked if I’m anti-Native, he asked about those flyers.

Knowles: Who did?

Palin: The caller Tony, the caller.

Knowles: No, he said that I said that you were anti-Native.

Palin: Who was the question to Dan?

Fagan: Well, let’s try answer both questions. First of all…

Palin: And let me answer the question. Anti-Native, absolutely not. As the caller just pointed out, my husband is Yupik, my children are Native, we are raising them to cherish their native heritage there. So, yeah it’s offensive to see that steam of emails being circulated around by a member of Tony Knowles’s staff on the campaign. Yeah, that’s kind of hurtful. But, um, no, I think that we need with our subsistence impasse that the state of Alaska has faced for all these years, we need to finally unite around this and resolve to resolve the issue.

Fagan: Well, let me ask Governor Knowles, do you have staff member issuing anti-Native…

Knowles: Absolutely not. That is just fabricated. It’s made up.

Fagan: What do you base that on, Sarah?

Palin: Sarah Scanlan who is a name on those emails and your running mate…your running mate’s campaign manager, one of the treasurers is Georgiana Lincoln. Those two names, Tony, on those circulated emails.

Knowles: They’re, they’re both Inupiat Eskimos and you’re saying that they are saying that you are anti Native?

Palin: I’m surprised you haven’t seen the stream of emails, Tony, but we’ll forward them to ya. But no, I’m not anti-Native and those who need the resources most there, with that subsistence impasse, let’s let them harvest it first and we can do that.

Knowles: “You say that they’re saying that you’re anti-Native”

Palin: “We’ll send you the emails, Tony, yes.”

  7     November 3, 2006 - 8:48am | coldstrings

Now We Know Where Sarah Palin Stands

Sarah Palin stands with Ron Sommerville, and the other members of the Alaska Outdoor Council, many of whom are on her campaign staff. No wonder the Alaska Native community is upset.

During the Channel 7 debate, the real Sarah Palin showed up, far to the right of Frank Murkowski. If Sarah Palin were elected Governor, the next four years would be constant fighting as Alaskans defend themselves against her far right stands on subsistence, abortion, creationism, school vouchers, and health care rights.

Tony Knowles is focused on the Alaska Gas Pipeline, and supporting issues of Education and Health Care. Knowles' issues are the issues most Alaska families care about. Tony's campaign is at the political center, that stable, reliable and predictable political center where Alaskans get things done.

  6     November 3, 2006 - 1:18am | amoeba

Did you hear Sarah's tone change?

When Sen. Lincoln called in? Too bad these transcripts don't show intonation.
During the whole debate, Sarah was very aggressive. But when Sen. Lincoln called in at the end of the show to call Sarah out on the carpet, Sarah's tone completely changed.
I listened to the show and what I heard was this: Sarah said Sen. Lincoln and the Knowles campaign were sending emails around saying she was anti-Native. Sen. Lincoln called in to defend herself and Sarah was basically non-responsive. It almost sounded as if Sarah hadn't really read the emails herself, just heard about them from staff or something. If you're going to attack an important Alaskan leader like Sen. Lincoln, you really ought to have your facts straight, especially if that attack involves a sensitive and personal issue like racism.
Now that we get to read the emails, it's clear that Sarah was wrong to mischaracterize Sen. Lincoln's email. She owes the senator a very public apology.

  November 3, 2006 - 6:24am | jacekone

Palin must apologize to Lincoln

Lincoln is not a candidate in this campaign and is definitely owed an apology for the mischaracterization by Palin. Kudos to Lincoln for calling in. Is Palin actually surprised that Alaskans email others about the candidates stand on issues? There was nothing untrue in that email. It was all TRUE and that only hurts you, Sarah, dear.

Everytime Palin discusses native issues, she alienates natives even more. "Cherish" and "honor" mean nothing in politico speak. Everyone knows that, especially Sarah.

Katie John is a landmark case for AK Natives. The outright refusal to support that decision says it all - Sarah IS anti-subsistence on every level. And Sarah is also the only one in the room who refuses to make that connection.

  November 3, 2006 - 9:59am | GeordieBC

What a crock of crap!

I am Native and I got the e-mail by Lincoln. It said anti-rural but we all read it as "anti-native" and that's how she meant it. Sarah Palin called it as it was meant : That she was anti-Native. Now for Georgianna to come out and say, "I only said you were anti-rural..." what a crock of crap that is. Sarah should have never backed down from her. All of us Natives know double talk when we hear it. If the non Native had sent it out as anti-rural they would have been called anti-Native!! Native's wouldn't have let them get away with it!!
I was glad to see the Native support behind Sarah at her press conference - Frank Pagano and company. What a crock this has turned into. Lincoln lost the courage of her convictions - her and Myrna's e-mail was definately calling Palin anti-Native even though they used the term "rural". For shame!

  November 4, 2006 - 3:09am | lewisandclark

Dem's committed to rural Issues

NOT!

I think this link shows how well the rural folks get heard by your Democratic "leaders". Really conciencoius people down there at the Knowles camp.

And they call Sarah a no-show. Here's what the bush committee gets from representatives they pay for.

From this AFSCME Link:
http://www.afscmelocal52.org/content/view/243/251/

[And additionally, one of the teleconferences that was scheduled soon after the Committee, Kim Metcalfe inadvertently missed the meeting herself and she is always the person who sets up the bridge to the teleconference. So people were kind of waiting around and nothing happened.]

Doesn't it describe eight years of Tony to a "T?" Waiting around and nothing happened- gasline or whatever. This is just one examlpe of the type of appointments Knowles surrounds himself with.

Really in it for getting the rural vote by any sort scandalous trick, but the deaf ear expected as soon as elected.

  November 3, 2006 - 8:53am | Black3

Why do Democrats

always want somebody to apologize? Of course, when they do something really objectionable like call our troops stupid, they don't apologize before then do apologize and then the apology isn't really an apology.

  November 5, 2006 - 2:42am | lewisandclark

Mike? is it Mike? (Black3) will YOU apologize?

Maybe I'm wrong. I love to be wrong. Fallibility is something I consider constantly. But who else but B#3 knows this stuff that goes on? It seems to me you are likely a state employee high up enough to stab some backs at will. I thought you were AG but Division Director B#@*$%^& seems more likely.

It seems to me that your participation on this blog IS during state work hours. It seems to me that the whole reason the Palin campaign has gained momentum of the likes it has is from getting rid of Division Directors (?) like you. Perfectly aware of rules, and still blogging, perhaps on a state computer, and definitely during work hours as you do. Put it out there Mike!

How do you know what you know about The State's GOV and not be part of it? DECED or whatever is what I figure. Where you work. You've been politicaly assigned to F&^%$ yourself! Right here in public on this blog. Go See how you have campaigned on this blog during state work hours. FBI wants to root this out through a fair "due process" just as they call what they do to the railroad process for State employees who demand fair access to state opportunity. Hand in hand with the "Union" in "Solidarity" as they say, or as you say, and IO as you will be "On your own Lonely Road." (black #3), the likes of OPAL, MIKE__I. Lauri_jo6,
Straighttakker, BC MCDANIEL9, Leslie,Lariiejo_6,coldstrings will all want to know if you are posting from a State computer as you appear to be during work hours, as you also appear to be now.

As I see it all these people who have no "real jobs" as you asess, or have lost their "real jobs" because of legitimate complaints are safe. They have no conflict of interest like you, and all the freedom to speak, as public citizens, no matter who is in the (your) office blogging. You may not have that same freedom in doing that from a state computer.Maybe if you had some juicy scandal to expose it might be different but the "drivel " as you call it does not belong in the State workplace, Mike.

Back to to your cubbyhole until the new boss comes around to .... Until you you're "appointed to retire."

No telling them they're "foil hat crazy" 'cause YOU are the one that campaigned on state time. That's as crazy as Ben Stevens assuming he shouldn't have to report sh8 because there was an investigation/ inquiry and he assumed they already knew where his money comes from. Wrong. You have pushed your immunity too far.

I saw the same- you are the lowly brown-noe\sirs ready to take a position for being an assasin or whatever it takes. One step up the ladder and a lesson in how to be arbitrary and capricious. Sarah will get rid of you too if I make a stink with the FBI.

But why not recognize it is YOU that it just escalates the problems? I'm sure you're maybe qualified on your trip to the top, but how many qualified people did you screw, and do you continue to screw to hold a position where you can say "POST SECONDARY EDUCATION IS DRIVEL" in this public forum? Do we need to find out that it is just a "Risk Management Game" to hedge bets on YOUR lawbreaking? I'll bet my retirement YOU ARE ON THE WAY OUT. And as you say as soon as the hand gets off the bible on inauguration day.

Are you in the State Service on the days you posted, and were you posting at from a state computer?
Anmswer us (but you won't)

C'mon Tony bots help me out here!
Your candidate may fall on his face but at least take a prisoner! This person might be in fact blogging- campaigning- on state time!! BOOT IT OUT! Kick it to the curb!

Find Out! Make him aqpologize to to tune of $12,000.

Is he in DOCED? At 10:30 in the AM? Who Knows Black3? Do you Agree about inauguration day?

  November 5, 2006 - 7:53am | Black3

Yep, salmon shark is reincarnated.

I'm thinking your picture is on practically every reception desk in State offices in Juneau, your email address is blocked on State computers, though you keep changing it, and you have a no trespassing order that prevents you from entering most buildings, and for good reason because you're a complete wacko.

And in addition to being completely crazy, you're completely wrong.

  November 3, 2006 - 9:58am | mike_l

Evangelical's

Why do evangelical pastor's, married with kids, pay gay prostitutes for sex and the preach about "evils" of being gay?

Why do Republican congressmen have sex with teenage boys?

Why do we have a Corrupt Bastards Club scandal?

The church going people who normally vote Republican -are changing their minds. They and their relgious beliefs have been USED by the Republican Party.

  November 3, 2006 - 10:09am | Black3

You'd think that a Democrat

with all their fawning over perceived rights would know the difference between an accusation and a conviction.

That Pastor, whoever he is, says he's innocent and the truth will out. I'm very suspicious of allegations like that coming out a week before an election.

There is NO evidence of a Republican congressman having sex with teenage boys. There is proof of a Democrat congressman having a sexual relationship with a young page, and the Democrats gave him a standing O.

And I haven't seen any indictments, just a very splashy FBI raid then silence - except from Democrats.

  November 3, 2006 - 4:42pm | alaskastraightalker

Just wait

Some of your good friends will be doing the perp walk soon.

The Pastor now admits he bought meth from the gay prostitute, but never used it. Probably he stuck his ____ in only half way, too.

  November 3, 2006 - 7:35pm | Black3

Actually, I don't give a f**k about

the pastor. That old saying about someone being slick as a preacher's ____ at camp meeting time didn't come from nowhere. There's lots of weak-minded people in the world. Don't follow leaders and watch your parking meters.

  November 3, 2006 - 4:45pm | alaskandomer

Kind of like when Clinton

Kind of like when Clinton didn't inhale.

  November 3, 2006 - 9:18am | coldstrings

A Proud Community

It is hard to find the words to describe how far out of line John Kerry was.

But regarding the Alaska Native community, sir, theirs is a record of service to be proud of. Since WWI, and in every conflict in which the U.S.A. has fought since, including Vietnam, the Gulf War, and Iraq, the Native American community has consistently sent the highest percentage of their young men and women to serve. Two of the hands throwing up the flag on top of Mount Suribachi belonged to a Native American. Lets not forget the young Hopi woman, Laurie Piestewa, and her sacrifice in Iraq.

Lets have a care when we talk about our Alaska Native neighbors. They have earned our consideration.

  November 3, 2006 - 9:29am | Black3

I am well aware

of the proud service to our country rendered by Alaska Natives, but please point out to me where I even mentioned Alaska natives in the post to which you responded.

  5     November 3, 2006 - 12:02am | trutheater

?????

It all seems pretty clear to me.

Palin accuses a paid Knowles employee of calling her anti-native in an email. Clearly such an accusation requires some proof.

The proof she provides comes in the form of an email claiming that Palin is anti-rural on a subsistence priority.

Does rural=native in twisted Palin math? If I recall, some very influential federal legislation on this issue didn't view rural as synonymous with native... Perhaps she should take a look at it.

  4     November 2, 2006 - 11:17pm | alaskastraightalker

Palin's hypocrisy

If Palin wants to make a big deal out of e-mails sent by some Knowles supporters,as well as try to deceive people about what they said, so that she can play the race card, then she should turn over to Kyle all the e-mails in her campaign's possession that were sent or received by campaign staff and/or supporters.

Kyle can go through them eliminate those related to actual campaign strategy, and print samples of the rest.

Please start with ones by Paul Fuhs, Robin Taylor, and Jerry Ward.

Kyle- ask for them. I'll bet she refuses.

  November 2, 2006 - 11:33pm | lewisandclark

Yeah right.

Sarah will have those right to you.

Tony will do the same right?

DOOOD! Get real doood!

  3     November 2, 2006 - 9:56pm | coldstrings

Sarah Palin and Ron Sommerville

are both members of the Alaska Outdoor Council, as are many other members of the Palin campaign. No wonder the Alaska Native community feels threatened.

The Alaska Native community has a right to defend itself and their homeland. They have the right to political association. They have the right to advocate their position, just as strongly as the AOC does among its own membership.

The majority of Alaskans support a constitutional amendment for a rural subsistence priority. Tony Knowles supports the amendment, and favors letting the people vote on it. I concur.

  2     November 2, 2006 - 8:02pm | biceps

Knowles has beginning Alzheimers

This is serious stuff. Watch Tony Knowles and listen to him closely. You can see it and hear it. I swear the guy is developing Alzheimer's Disease. Alaskans don't need this in their government. Tony's time is long gone already. He has reduced his campaign to utter insults and baby talk. Alaska deserves far better. Yes, I know the Dems are desperate and will do anything at this point, but couldn't they have at least fielded a candidate who wasn't sick? Knowles looks like he has to be propped-up. Must have been something in the water he drank, something he smoked. Go to sick-bay, Tony and get some help. You are looking more pathetic each day.

  November 3, 2006 - 11:30am | mike_l

Palin wears hair pieces

but you don't see me pointing that out to everyone.

You and your fanatical friends voted for Frank en masse back in 2002, when he was much older than Tony is now.

We need age at this point in the game and the wisdom that comes with it. Knowles will get us a gasline contract. Palin won't and can't. And a vote for Palin is a vote for an administration that includes Jerry Ward, Robin Taylor, and Susan Harvey.

  November 2, 2006 - 8:50pm | opal

Funny you say

that the "Dems are deserate and will do anything at this point" while making ridiculous comments about Knowles age. Alzheimers? Oh, please. Clearly you are trying to change the subject because Palin has not said or done anything that's made you want to shout "hell yeah!" Why don't you discuss her positions on the issues. Creationism in schools? Abortion? Subsistence? The Gasline? Took vague, or too out of the mainstream? Not anything you want to repeat or to become known?

  November 2, 2006 - 11:32pm | alaskastraightalker

Don't bother replying. It's just

Turdball's partner. In fact, they're in the darkroom just now.

  November 3, 2006 - 12:42am | alaskastraightalker

Is it the bondage photo

with Robin Taylor?

  November 2, 2006 - 7:30pm | wakeup

Is there nothing?

Turdball - is there no low too low that you and your pals won't stoop to in this campaign? And I'm supposed to go to the polls on Tuesday and vote for you all to ascend to State leadership positions of responsibity and public trust? Guess again.

What's next from your side? The race card yesterday - the porn card today -- I can't even imagine what tomorrow might bring.

Take a Stand?

How about "Clean It Up."

I'm a conservative Christian evangelical, private business owner, pro oil, life long Republican who will be voting for Tony come Tuesday.

I was going to cast my vote with remorse (since I have always voted my Party). After the antics, lies, and disgraceful behavior of my Party's candidate and her team, I will be voting for Tony on Tuesday - with pride.

  November 4, 2006 - 3:14am | lewisandclark

Christian Evangelical

Get ready to turn the other cheek because I can tell the election results are going to be a real slap in the face for you.

  November 3, 2006 - 11:00am | rfn

guard closely

Hang onto that pride!

It may be all you have left when Tony taxes you.

  November 2, 2006 - 7:33pm | mike_l

no comment

but his/her screename says it all. It's a smokescreen in case his candidate cries on the Channel 7 debate tonight.

I'm running home for a donut and beer.

By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.