Kohring's lawyer is known for being flamboyant, effective : comments

Return to Kohring's lawyer is known for being flamboyant, effective

  20     October 29, 2007 - 10:09am | alyeska34

He got his preference

He said he would rather represent someone he thinks is guilty, as I'm sure he doesn't think Kohring is innocent!

flag this »

  19     October 28, 2007 - 9:20pm | funny_funster

flamboyant

Flamboyant or not Vic is going to jail.

flag this »

  October 29, 2007 - 10:05am | kellied

No lapdog here

Yes! But he will not sit by like a lazy lapdog and let the federal gov't put him in jail-- he will stand by and bark-bark-bark while they do it.

flag this »

  18     October 28, 2007 - 9:19pm | shasta2

I feel sorry...

For the poor dumb son of a bitches who don't have the connections to run for political office..

flag this »

  17     October 28, 2007 - 7:06pm | gilld

Two Points to Consider:

- it's taking big bucks to keep John Wayne Henry Anthony Browne-Ross, Esq. (don't forget Vic's "local" attorney) in designer suits and Hummers; I'm sure the billable hours are adding up;
- Vic's not paying a penny; his aged parents have likely hocked their entire retirement future to keep their son out of federal prison.

On the last point, particularly: Kohring is to be despised.

Oh, one more thing: has anyone seen Vic's wife and step-daughter in the courtroom?

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 7:35pm | niklake

Kohring family at trial

A number of family members have been there, all locals. His wife has not been present.

flag this »

  October 29, 2007 - 10:04am | kellied

Is he divorced or not?

Is he divorced or not?

flag this »

  16     October 28, 2007 - 6:34pm | zidar

Flamboyant

"Flamboyant" is an adjective used to describe only lawyers and homosexuals.

flag this »

  15     October 28, 2007 - 1:32pm | adnak

Attorney John Henry Browne-history

Excerpt from a book on the Wah Mee Massacre trial in Seattle:

http://www.wahmee.com/chapnine.html

Browne was flamboyant, impeccably dressed, arrogant, and articulate. He was a tall, thin man -- 6-foot-6, 200 pounds -- with brown hair and a thick mustache. He had a barbed-wire tattoo on his right forearm, drove a motorcycle on the weekends, and meditated regularly. He had graduated from Northwestern University in Illinois, holding both law and master's degrees. Browne was born in Tennessee, the youngest of two children. His father once worked as a nuclear engineer for the Atomic Energy Commission before retiring in Palo Alto, California, after serving as a vice president at Bechtel Corporation. After high school, Browne enrolled at the University of Denver, where he studied philosophy, played guitar in a rock group, and protested the Vietnam War in the late-1960s. An epiphanic moment for Browne occurred in the late-1960s when he was arrested for writing a bad check. The charge was dropped after police discovered that the check bounced because Browne had moved his account to a different bank by the time the check was cashed. His fianc�e, the daughter of a wealthy East Coast family, bailed him out, but not until he had spent seventeen hours with men whom had been in jail for a week and still didn't have a lawyer. He decided right then he would be a criminal defense attorney. Browne broke off the engagement, quit the band (which was on the verge of a record contract) and enrolled in American University Law School in Washington, D.C. In 1972 Browne was hired as an assistant attorney general for Washington under then-Attorney General Slade Gorton. Posing as an inmate, Browne spent a couple of days in the maximum-security wing at the prison in Shelton, Washington, and rewrote rules on punishment within the institutions. He joined the King County Public Defender's Office in 1975 and soon became chief trial attorney. In the late-1970s Browne opened a private practice in downtown Seattle.

Browne was one of Seattle's best defense attorneys and, because his clients were often the subjects of high-profile trials, he was rumored to have taken cases on contingency.

John Henry Browne

Browne had his critics. He received hate mail and his office remained locked, for security, during business hours. A stranger once approached Browne and called him "the most hated man in the state." A state Supreme Court justice once commented that Browne "needed to be spanked." Browne once wore a white three-piece suit to court. After the judge ruled on a motion, he turned to Browne and said, "Now, I would like two fudge sundaes and a cream soda, please."

Rebecca Roe, a Seattle attorney who faced Browne in court, commented, "He [personalized] everything. He regularly [made] vicious personal attacks on other attorneys. He [is] the single most unpleasant attorney to deal with in King County."

Many thought Browne took high-profile cases simply to get publicity. "In the beginning of my practice," Browne admitted to a reporter before the Wah Mee trials, "publicity was very helpful. But I don't need the publicity now. I'd rather do something else than try some of these cases. But I'm a defense attorney and I take our system very seriously. People take their freedom for granted. They don't teach civics anymore. They don't realize how delicate the system is. It is a simple equation: The more power you give to government, the less power you give to individuals."

"He never seems to doubt the righteousness of his case," remarked Dan Satterberg, chief of staff for the King County Prosecutor's Office. "His hard-nosed style seems based on his unshakable belief, real or conjured, that his clients are always innocent or deserving of a break. Other attorneys will allow themselves to have a casual aside with a prosecutor that he thinks his case is weak or his client is lying. But you won't get any of that from John."

Browne was a colorful character in the courtroom. He once represented a man charged with custodial interference for taking his son and moving out of the area, although his ex-wife had been awarded custody during their divorce. Browne made the woman's behavior the defense. When he began his closing argument, Browne didn't even rise from his chair. "Ladies and gentlemen," he told the jury, "would you leave your dog with that woman for the weekend?" The jury acquitted.

In another case he defended a doctor named Jim Stansfield, charged with killing his wife and a neighbor. The trial was memorable for several reasons: a Hamlet-reciting medical examiner, and a key prosecution witness with such a long criminal record that Browne rolled his rap sheet from one end of the courtroom to the other. Charges were dismissed on the last day of trial.

Browne would spend much of the 1980s drinking and taking drugs. He lived in a waterfront home, drove fancy cars, and made headlines. He married and divorced three times. Later, in a 1998 interview with the Times, Browne reflected on his wild and crazy days. He was in counseling in 1986 when he was asked, "What do you want?"

"It was a great question," Browne said in the interview. "I didn't know." Shortly thereafter, he went to Death Valley to attend an intensive 10-day self-awareness seminar conducted by Dr. Richard Moss. He stayed in sweat lodges, taking long speaking and eating fasts and spending hours on his hands and knees scrubbing floors. He began to read the poetry of Mevlana Jalaluddin Rumi, one of the Sufi spiritual masters of the Thirteenth Century.

Browne was against the death penalty -- not uncommon for a criminal defense attorney. He was also a fine attorney. He reveled in his role as a defense attorney, despite the fact that such attorneys are held in such low regard. While defending Bundy in the early-1980s, a Seattle detective allegedly tried to get Browne to leak information about his client. "He was trying to get me to help him with nailing Ted!" Browne told a reporter. "When we do that, the system doesn't work! Then our Constitution is for everyone but Ted Bundy or whoever the next unpopular person may be. [The courthouse is] a 'Temple of Justice' not a 'Temple of Political Correctness.'" No other profession suited Browne more than the courtroom. "I like people. I like juries," Browne added. "I like to be in court."

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 6:31pm | Citizenview

A steller biography

Yeah, the defence lawyer Browne seems to have acquired some steller qualifications by perseverence and an ideology that is very fit for a criminal defence lawyer. He is in the same league as Gerry Spence. You cannot "teach" ideologies. This is one reason that the public defenders are not only insincere but ideologically much less driven esp. when compared to all prosecutors who have no compunction to go for the jugular. Indigent defence is a joke in a country that carries the world torch of civil liberties. Poor people get sold in the court rooms across the land all day long.

Often times, prosecuting attorneys get appointed to the benches compared to people even quarter as much worth Browne. I tell you, there are so many "obstructions" to becoming a good criminal lawyer despite the need in a society that has compromised the writ of habeus corpus. The money is not great for most. Poor and modestly well to do people do not have much money to spend on resources such as experts and forensics. In most criminal cases, the state can bluff its way from issuing a warrant to throwing a book at someone and forcing a plea. It is said that a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. It is a scary thought for those who stand for the constitutions.

One of my kids happens to be of the ideology Mr. Browne is gifted with. She is a brand new lawyer out of an Ivy League school who has interned for US Attorney's office, seen the top field agents at work, and has actually witnessed the power of our government. We, the people have vested that power into those who are sworn in to protect and preserve the constitution and the civil liberties. But, the system is not without flaws. For instance, exculpatory evidence is whthheld from the defence. Tell me, how are you to discover that without the presssure to bear in an open court of law? Were you surprised to hear when the prosecutor fainted in Randy Weaver's murder trial and was fined by the presiding Federal judge? Was it not Gerry Spence who exposed the whole scheme of fabrication of evidence against Weaver?

I am proud as an American that there are Brownes out there while I do not overlook the fact that there are bad ass criminals out there either. Things such as excoriation of people's trust in high office must be dealt with accountability, how can you forget the fact that many a criminal was convicted because his defence lawyer fell asleep, did not even prepare, did not object, did not, did not, did not, did not...

Lastly, those of us who have little kids to raise have to be extra careful these days. The government has so much power now a days that a fake complaint made against a parent CAN result into a total ruin of a family. Today, the government has access to your bed rooms via your kids. If you tick off your wife, she will use this system against you and against her as well, the case law is replete with examples. It takes much more awareness today as to who is actually corrupt. The corrupt in power never seem to get punished as the common man does.

Most of the above reflections pertain to our constitutional protections and those who stand by them. Mr. Kohring's case is begining to reveal that the government's star witnesses were the most corrupting influences on a weak legislator in high office. I think that Mr. Browne has impeached these vegabonds who are to receive only a slap on the wrist for their "cooperation" while the small fish is to be fried in a big way. And, the big fish is laughing out loud rolling his ass on the floor so hard that he may get a hernia from it. One cannot afford to lose one's sense of propotionality in this whole mess. End

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 10:27pm | thurstin6

wrong about PD's

While I agree with your sentiment about the need for good criminal defense lawyers, I completely disagree with your perception of public defenders. All of the public defenders I know (about 80), are true patriots: giving thier very best effort to make sure that the poor are not swallowed up by the system. In Alaska, PD's start at only $30K....after racking up $100K+ in student loan debt...they are nothing if not dedicated to ensuring equality of the system. Now, the private criminal lawyers....they come in all varieties...there are plenty of them in the business to make a ton of money.....not so with PD's.
But, don't think because the pay is bad and the deck is stacked for the prosecution, that PD's aren't doing an incredible job. And, because many of the clients are in fact guilty, their job is not to get every one of them off, but to make sure they get a equal shot at a fair trial or dispostion. I for one, admire their tireless dedication to equality.

flag this »

  October 29, 2007 - 8:28pm | Citizenview

Yes

And yes, you are correct in many ways, i apologize for impugning the PD's or at least the appearance of impugning them. I do not quite understand the fact that on one hand we have too many lawyers and on the other, too many are jobless and underpaid. PDs are underpaid and much overworked. i agree that most PDs are motivated ideologically and they have decent convictions that gives them something of value that just money may not. It is just that the PDs wake up to a huge load of files and phone messages every day that he is simply not physically able to do his work. Compromising advocacy results by default, as it were. However, where incentive and motivation are lacking, the sheep will be sent to the slaughterhouse.

It is a travesty that some defence lawyers 'work' 50 or more hours in a 24 hour day, the PDs cannot do that kind of 'licking and billing' as i call it. And then, we have judges of the higher courts who basically do nothing for work as jurists except play around some young intern while the actual opinions are written by their law clerks.

Most people in the know will tell you that PD is the last person they would use for their criminal defence. This does not mean corruption. It means that there is only so much money for indigent defence.

There are other considerations as well. We as a nation need to come to terms with health care etc. More public funds are required in those areas than some others. And yet, the intrinsic corruption of our health care system has been so systemic that nothing is going to fix that over any short time period.

Aristotle said, "There are some occupations in which it is impossible to be virtuous".

flag this »

  14     October 28, 2007 - 1:08pm | adn_20_antegrenkid

Kohring's lawyers comments...

Some astute readers are analyzing Kohring's lawyers statements and are sensing Kohring might be in a heap of trouble with his legal representation... Here is the one that got me...

"I am not going to sit there like some lapdog and help the government put my guy in jail," Browne said a couple of weeks before the trial.

Now there are several ways you can analyze this statement, but what I hear is that Kohring's attorney is saying his guy is going to jail, but he isn't going to just sit down and take it... In other words, he will stand up and take it??? Yikes!!! too bad Kohring didn't pick a better career... If he had chosen to be a used car salesman or a matress salesman, he could have been crooked, lied thru his teeth and made a ton of money, and maybe even been a local celebrity on TV...

flag this »

  13     October 28, 2007 - 12:12pm | tinkcicle

Retirement?

If Vic is found guilty I don't think he should qualify for his retirement from the state and he should have to pay it back...and frankly I think Vic is full of shit because when I retired from the state it took serveral months for me to even be able to roll it over into a fund I control...of course I was a regular state employee and not in the Legislature.

flag this »

  12     October 28, 2007 - 10:17am | franklin_6

Kohring is guilty as sin.

Poor Vic, sitting there in the chair while his Republican buds are still yuking it up in Juneau subcommittees.

Browne wants to defend Vic by making the point that Vic is a small fish and Ben Stevens is still unindicted.

Weak argument, Mr. Browne. You'll be worth six figures if you make it stick, and the jury that buys it won't be worth a damn.

flag this »

  11     October 28, 2007 - 9:50am | FranzSigelShroy

who pays this rated "average" talking head?

http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/98104-wa-john-browne-4323.html

Who is paying for this attorney, and why? If Alaskan politicians can be bought off for the cost of a used pickup truck, who is paying for JHB's fee? Certainly not the drunk, bumbling, foul-mouthed good-ol-boy in the videos!

flag this »

  10     October 28, 2007 - 9:50am | kellied

no pictures?

THIS ARTICLE IS USELESS WITHOUT PICTURES.

flag this »

  9     October 28, 2007 - 8:59am | joan_of_bethel

guilty

Kohring is guilty. His attorney likes them that way so he may indulge is his hobby: chess with live pawns. It's the game that counts...

flag this »

  8     October 28, 2007 - 8:16am | xango_xango

OH NO

John may have became politically intoxicated from Vic's fumes and fell into the gutter. Somebody better go buy him a pair of extra tuffs to go with his bargain basement suits and highlights. Does this guy look like Jerry Springer to anyone else out there?

flag this »

  7     October 28, 2007 - 7:39am | akcop

John Henry Browne

Well colorful or not, loud mouthed or not John Henry you are no Gerry Spence no matter how you blow your own horn.

It is always tough when you are defending the undefensible, so go on attack like the bull dog you claim to be. Alaskan juries are usually more attuned to the lack of truth and honesty of politicians than you can blow-hard in your smoke and mirrors.

flag this »

  6     October 28, 2007 - 7:01am | huntfish

Attny Browne's comment

If I were a client of John Henry Browne, I would not be pleased with his closing comment, "I'd much rather represent someone I think is guilty," nor do I think, given at a time & in a situation like this, that comment shows great intellect on the part of Mr. Browne.

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 9:58am | kellied

This could have been taken out of context and it's OK

He could have said this in a term paper that was published on line. He didn't have to have said it recently. All the reporter needs to do is find the quote as him having said it at some point, possibly taken out of contest, and --boom-- it's in. He ~did~ say it, ergo, it is OK to print it.

Law school is full of people who have English and journalism degrees, as is the reporting field. Browne is probably reading this and putting it into his scrap book (or framing it) and smiling. If you've ever been into WAR's office, you will know what I'm talking about.

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 8:49am | BravoSierra

Not an uncommon attitude among attorneys

To hold your own ego above your clients best interest. Another example:
Sen. Ted Stevens' (R-AK) superstar white collar defense lawyer Brendan Sullivan made Washingtonian's list of most influential DC law and lobbying types.And what drives this successful lawyer? He's pretty up front:

“By the time somebody comes to me, they are pretty far up the creek,” Sullivan has said. “The good thing is they will pay almost anything.”

flag this »

  5     October 28, 2007 - 6:45am | adn_20_antegrenkid

Kohring's Lawyer on Vacation in Alaska???

The toughest cases, he says, are when he really believes his client is innocent. If he loses then, it hits hard. "I'd much rather represent someone I think is guilty."

flag this »

  4     October 28, 2007 - 5:55am | xango_xango

Kohring's Props= no work ethic

His no tax and spend mantra with his hand out the whole time, couch,crappy car & trailer, Little Abner Personality, step daughter, easter eggs, girl scouts,
perdiem....
Most people don't even like to ask for money for food for the table and this guy has no shame. He became politically intoxicated and fell into the gutter.

flag this »

  3     October 28, 2007 - 4:46am | daveheriot

If he's a great lawyer...

If he's that good at getting people off then maybe the Linehan's should have hired him too.
(-;

flag this »

  2     October 28, 2007 - 2:45am | wjd20062001

Explanation is insulting

I guess he thinks it will do Vic Kohring some good to show how many feds it took to take down our corrupt legislature. This reaches all the way up into our congressional delegation. Now he's saying that these cash handouts are really "gifts from friends"? Is that the best explanation this six-figure suit can come up with? This is an insult. He must think we're REALLY stupid up here in Alaska.

flag this »

  1     October 28, 2007 - 1:05am | mcgraw

I have to laugh!

The Judge said "the news coverage had been fair."

It has been a witch hunt from day one.

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 6:16am | robert_stone

Witch Hunt

It sure has been. There has ALWAYS been corruption in politics, it continues yet today. There is always someone getting some support traded to each other on how they vote.....most of which you and I will never know. I still believe there is much much more to this entire story and we the people will probably never really know the whole truth.

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 6:38pm | niklake

Kohring is hellaciously superstitious, but he's no Witch

This ongoing series of trials - more to be added soon - don't strike me as a witch hunt. I've been down there, watching his trial. One of his, and Browne's claims, is that the ADN and other media outlets have mistreated him over the years. I've saved some of his op-eds, dating back to 1996. The ADN has carried his strange rants for years, the Voice of the Times more often, and the Frontiersman has carried him on a very regular basis. I don't have a search tool that would retreive all his op-eds, but I doubt the ADN has ever turned him down.

Regarding this paper's coverge of the three trials so far, I'm impressed. And I'm not a very big fan of this paper.

flag this »

  October 28, 2007 - 1:53am | akzero2007

Define witch hunt

What has been a witch hunt? The part about the lawmakers accepting cash from VECO? The part about lawmakers asking, "what they can do for VECO during the legislative session"? The part about trading political favors for employment opportunities for relatives?

Is informing the public about allegedly corrupt lawmakers a witch hunt or simply a process of gathering court documents and attending trials then letting the public know what is going on?

Perhaps a history lesson on Nazi Germany and witch hunts would help you understand the role of Politicians, Journalists, Federal Agents, etc.

This kind of thought is amusing. Why do people always want to kill the messenger of bad news instead of the people who are doing the bad news?

flag this »

show comments

Comments

NEW STORY COMMENTS: Learn about our upgrade | Create an avatar in the new system »

By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to adn.com's user agreement.

hide comments