Alaska Politics Blog

This is the place to talk about Alaska politics, state, local, national. Public life in the Last Frontier has rarely been more interesting -- a full slate of federal and state elections, the influence of former Gov. Sarah Palin, the usual hardball Alaska politics. Come here for news, tidbits and information, and join the discussion. We encourage lively debate, but please keep it civil and stay on point. Don't use profanity, make crude comments or attack other posters. Posts that violate the Terms of Use will be deleted. Repeat offenders will lose their ability to post comments.

New Senate organization announced - 11/7/2012 12:48 pm

Homer Revealed - 8/22/2012 2:08 pm

Seven-day countdown - 5/25/2012 8:37 pm

Anchorage city clerk resigns (UPDATED) - 5/23/2012 10:51 am

Gara to seek re-election - 5/2/2012 2:04 pm

For one lawmaker: Good news - 4/27/2012 12:20 pm

Anticipation in the Capitol - 4/26/2012 11:38 am

Election Commission finds 1/2 of precincts ran out of ballots; recommends no investigation - 4/25/2012 5:08 pm

Legislators enthusiastic about in-state gas pipeline

From Sean Cockerham in Anchorage –

Legislators are pretty excited about today's release of a report on what it would take for them to build an in-state pipeline to bring North Slope natural gas to Interior and Southcentral Alaska.

As skepticism grows about the prospects a big natural gas pipeline to export Alaska’s natural gas to the Lower 48 will happen anytime soon, lawmakers are increasingly turning their attention to the idea of a smaller in-state line just for Alaskan consumers.

It wouldn’t be cheap.

Previous estimates have figured a 24-inch line from the North Slope to tidewater in Southcentral Alaska would cost a $4 billion to build, not counting essential gas-handling and other facilities. Those would raise the total price to between $5.7 billion and $11.8 billion.

Alaska lacks the customer base to support such a project without a big state subsidy.

Petroleum economics consultant Roger Marks put out a report in February suggesting the state subsidy would have to cover at least $4.2 billion of the cost -- or more if there were cost overruns.

Marks suggested in his report that the state could be better off putting its money into pursuing hydroelectric (like the Susitna dam) or potentially using such a big subsidy to increase the chances for a natural gas pipeline to export gas to the Lower 48, a project that would bring in far more money to the state.

But legislators are losing patience with the dream of a gas pipeline to the Lower 48 and say Fairbanks, in particular, badly needs lower cost energy.

The report being release at 1 p.m. today was prepared by Dan Fauske of the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation. The Legislature in 2010 put Fauske in charge of the “Alaska Gasline Development Corporation” effort. The report is supposed to address the viability of the project and how to make it happen.

© Copyright 2011, The Anchorage Daily News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service