Alaska Politics Blog

This is the place to talk about Alaska politics, state, local, national. Public life in the Last Frontier has rarely been more interesting -- a full slate of federal and state elections, the influence of former Gov. Sarah Palin, the usual hardball Alaska politics. Come here for news, tidbits and information, and join the discussion. We encourage lively debate, but please keep it civil and stay on point. Don't use profanity, make crude comments or attack other posters. Posts that violate the Terms of Use will be deleted. Repeat offenders will lose their ability to post comments.

New Senate organization announced - 11/7/2012 12:48 pm

Homer Revealed - 8/22/2012 2:08 pm

Seven-day countdown - 5/25/2012 8:37 pm

Anchorage city clerk resigns (UPDATED) - 5/23/2012 10:51 am

Gara to seek re-election - 5/2/2012 2:04 pm

For one lawmaker: Good news - 4/27/2012 12:20 pm

Anticipation in the Capitol - 4/26/2012 11:38 am

Election Commission finds 1/2 of precincts ran out of ballots; recommends no investigation - 4/25/2012 5:08 pm

More on Palin's tax returns (Updated)

Update: From Tuesday's Wall Street Journal, under the headline Reimbursements Raise Tax Issues for Palin:

Several tax experts said they believe Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin is required to pay federal taxes on $25,000 in reimbursements from the state of Alaska for her children's travel expenses.

A partner in a New York law firm tells the Journal he thinks not reporting the Palin kids' travel reimbursements as taxable income is "a slam dunk problem" for the governor. But another accountant points out that the Palins used H&R Block, and that the state's W2 form didn't include the travel money as taxable income.

"These people [the Palins] are not tax lawyers. They went to H&R Block," he said.

Here's the original post:


From David Hulen in Anchorage --

People continue chewing over Palin's tax returns and federal financial disclosure released on Friday. Among those doing the heaviest chewing: TaxProf blog. The Tax Profs see trouble.

Under a post, Tax Profs Agree: Gov. Palin's Tax Returns Are Wrong, a couple tax law professors write that the Palins appear to have underpaid taxes. And they're not buying a letter issued by the campaign last week from Roger Olsen, a Washington, D.C., tax attorney, who defends the Palins' returns, including handling of per diem payments to Alaska's first family.

Writes John Bogdanski, professor of law at Lewis & Clark: "There is no serious debate (at least, none that has been brought to our attention) about the fact that at least the amounts paid for the children's travel -- $24,728.83 in 2007, according to the Washington Post -- are taxable. The campaign's tax lawyer has got at least that much of the law, and perhaps more, wrong."

In a later update, Bogdanski unearths the State of Alaska's posted policy on long-term per diem. He thinks the state failed to follow its own rules when it didn't include diem payments last year as taxable income for the governor.

This document is a potential blockbuster. It establishes two important facts:

(1) The state has long acknowledged that it had a duty to determine whether Palin's "tax home" was really Anchorage and Wasilla, a conclusion which would have required that her per diems be reported as taxable income.

(2) The state knew that when an employee is planning to spend a majority of her time on state business in the Anchorage area for a four-year period, Anchorage is the employee's "tax home," and per diems for time spent in the "tax home" are taxable income.

So why didn't Alaska officials follow the state's official policies and report Palin's per diems as taxable income on her W-2? Only they can answer that.

Another tax prof, Bryan Camp, from Texas Tech, finds other issues:

1. The Palins did not report as income some $17,000 that Governor Palin’s employer (the State of Alaska) paid her as an “allowance” for her travel. Can they do that? Yes, most likely.
2. The Palins did not report as income some $43,000 that the State of Alaska paid the Governor as an “allowance” for her husband and children’s travel. Can they do that? No, most likely not.
3. The Palins deducted $9,000 on their 2007 return, claiming it was a loss from Mr. Palin’s snow machine racing activity. Can they do that? Most likely not, but more info could make the deduction o.k. If any of the above issues goes against the Palins they then risk getting hit with the section 6662 penalty for “negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.”
4. Can the Palins avoid the section 6662 negligence penalty by claiming that they reasonably relied either (a) on the W-2’s sent to them by their employer, which did not reflect either the $17,000 or the $43,000, or (b) on their tax return preparer H&R Block, or (c) on Mr. Olsen’s opinion letter dated September 30, 2008? The three reliance defenses are unlikely to succeed, but more info may make the (b) defense a good one.
5. Does Mr. Olsen have any exposure to sanctions by the IRS because of his letter? I believe Mr. Olsen’s letter probably violates 31 C.F.R. section 10.35. If so, he would be exposed to possible sanctions from the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility.

A McCain campaign spokesman, Brian Jones, defended the campaign to the Wall Street Journal's Law Blog: “We have letters from tax experts on this. The State of Alaska conferred with the Internal Revenue Service, and this is the decision that they came to.”

© Copyright 2011, The Anchorage Daily News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  2     December 7, 2009 - 12:59am | bolingchina

Replica Watches at China

Replica Bags:Replica Bags
juicy couture tracksuits:juicy couture tracksuits
ralph lauren polos:ralph lauren polos
Replica Handbags:Replica Handbags
Replica Watches:Replica Watches
Fendi Replica:Fendi Replica
Bally Bags Replica:Bally Bags Replica
Replica Thomas Wylde:Replica Thomas Wylde
Christian Dior Handbag:Christian Dior Handbag
Jimmy Choo Handbags:Jimmy Choo Handbags
Jimmy Choo Fake Handbags:Jimmy Choo Fake Handbags
Thomas Wylde HandBags Replica:Thomas Wylde HandBags Replica
Fendi Fake Handbags:Fendi Fake Handbags
Givenchy Handbag:Givenchy Handbag
Louis Vuitton Bags:Louis Vuitton Bags
Replica Girard PerregauxReplica Girard Perregaux
Piaget ReplicaPiaget Replica
Fake Porsche Design WatchesFake Porsche Design Watches
Fake Tag HeuerFake Tag Heuer
Burett Watches ReplicaBurett Watches Replica
Replica Christian Dior WatchReplica Christian Dior Watch
Corum Watch ReplicaCorum Watch Replica
Chanel WatchesChanel Watches
Piaget Watches ReplicaPiaget Watches Replica
Spazio24 Watches Replica WatchSpazio24 Watches Replica Watch

flag this »

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service