Inside Opinion

If you have questions about how the Daily News makes editorial decisions, this blog has the answers. Editorial page editor Matt Zencey and writers Frank Gerjevic and Rosemary Shinohara will discuss what they're working on, answer questions and ask your perspective on issues facing Alaska.


Matt Zencey

Matt Zencey joined the Daily News as an editorial writer in 1985 and was named editorial page editor in May 2007. He has won several. "Best editorial writing" awards from the Alaska Press Club and was a Nieman Fellow in Journalism at Harvard University. He lives on the west side of Anchorage, where he enjoys the best weather in town and easy access to the Coastal Trail. E-mail Matt at mzencey@adn.com

Frank Gerjevic

Frank Gerjevic has worked at the Daily News since 1978, where he's been sports editor, copy editor, reporter and columnist. He's been an editorial writer since 1998. He began his newspaper career with the Anchorage Times in 1975. E-mail Frank at fgerjevic@adn.com

Rosemary Shinohara

Rosemary Shinohara is an editorial writer who has lived most of her life in Alaska. She has spent most of her career as a reporter or editor at the Daily News. She covered construction of the Alaska oil pipeline, the Legislature, schools and urban affairs. She has also been an editor for NPR's All Things Considered, and has written for the Associated Press. E-mail Rosemary at rshinohara.com

"I dare ADN to publish this." - 5/13/2008 8:42 am

Looking to save on gas and ride the bus? - 5/12/2008 9:35 am

Joe Contraire's latest, coming soon - 5/9/2008 2:41 pm

Sarcasm? Hah! A non-fan writes in.... - 5/9/2008 11:48 am

Who's accountable for ADN editorials? - 5/7/2008 11:14 am

Talk radio: Dittoheads vs liberals - 5/7/2008 11:01 am

More info and commentary on John McCain's health care 'plan' - 5/1/2008 6:29 pm

Join the dialogue on race and diversity - 4/30/2008 4:44 pm

How can our community as a whole combat prejudice and discrimination? - 4/30/2008 4:42 pm

What can an individual do about prejudice? - 4/30/2008 4:39 pm

Prejudice here - getting better or worse? - 4/30/2008 4:37 pm

Prejudice and discrimination: How are we doing in Anchorage? - 4/30/2008 4:36 pm

Not-so elevated discourse - 4/28/2008 4:20 pm

Elevated discourse - 4/28/2008 10:44 am

Yin and Yang - 4/25/2008 6:00 pm

UAA vs UAF - 4/24/2008 3:59 pm

Arctic Power demands retraction re Liddy - 4/23/2008 6:04 pm

Airport expansion vs. Kincaid trails - 4/23/2008 10:20 am

About the First Amendment - 4/23/2008 9:52 am

Irwin rips Exxon, partners on Point Thomson - 4/22/2008 5:25 pm

Tesche heads into the sunset - 4/22/2008 4:52 pm

Good words from Leonard Pitts - 4/22/2008 3:25 pm

Obama's defining moment

Click here for a transcript of Obama's speech on race and politics, which has become an important moment in his campaign.


login or register to post comments

  3     April 13, 2008 - 7:21pm | toklat2

a lot of misinformation on this issue

From the comments I am reading from some of the
commentators on this issue I can only suggest get
a more complete background of this story and then
make your thoughts on. ie the press did not try to
cover up this story..why would they? News is the
business of news and of course there is great competi
tion to get the first on any story as there just would
be. Most likely this did not come out the first day
the pastor made those comments as Obama said he
was not there and explained where he was at that time
most likely another rival political organization dug this
up as some will and that is how the news organization
got ahold of it. Obama said the pastor s words were
totaly wrong..did you ever have a friend or a co
worker , a boss or a pastor etc. say something you
did not at all agree with? Yet also know the good
they have done. This is what Obama said about his
experiences with this pastor who is retired at the
present. Please also remember the pastor s age..
an age where he did see as a young man much
very digrading ways they were treated and yes in
the United States of America..but thankfully that
day is far over..no one on only race should ever
be treated in that manner. I was in a large Texas
city once and because I am white and of the femminine
gender this very old black man got off the sidewalk
and walked then in the gutter.......how sad ..how
very wrong.. perhaps the pastor remembers and well
those ways when he was young. Obama said those
days are far over and gave his being able to be in
a position to run for the office of president of the
United States as proof of this. He also talked of his
own grandmother who he said he loves as much as
anyone in the world..who is white..who said she has
a somewhat fear if she encounters a black man she
does not know walking on the street. Do you get
it? Obama is saying some have a definite problem
with a person not being of the same race as they
are and only judging the person on that situation.
This is a true situation he is talking about he wants
a less divided on issues like this and instead solving
the many big problems the USA people do have today.
Also he also said the pastor in question had done
much good for young black men who were heading
in very bad situations ..told them to get busy and
work honestly to have and get respect for themselves
and to also know Jesus loves them to... it is not a
race issue...either black or white. Pretty important
stuff I would think and get to the issues as to
medical care for all Americans ..get something done
about this declining economy and all the very poor
trade deals we have made..dog and cat food killing
our animals etc...people not making enough money
paid enough as the economix situations get worse
and they are..where it has taken 2 incomes to support
a family in general.. these are the issues that should
be discussed and seriously by all Americans.
a side note.. I have heard other and of the white
race..pastors say because of the morals etc. now
in America perhaps Gos is letting some of the disaters
happen. these while not a pastor I know. are
influential pastors with many listerners so only black
no..One if honest would have to say..there sure
are a lot of declines in some very important areas
in our beautiful country today..ones that were not
there or much less years ago..so??

  2     March 27, 2008 - 6:46pm | dogpatch

Obama

This whole thing has forced the media to cover racism among blacks and not just make it look like only whites are racist. Imagine what would happen if a white preacher preached hate of the black man from the pulpit. Racism is wrong and destructive, no matter where it comes from.

Another thing-can we have a Commander in Chief who holds as family someone who hates this country??

I, like millions of others, thought Obama was a breath of fresh air. When Rev. Wright first became an issue, I gave Obama the benefit of the doubt. Then I had to stop living in denial and admit that if he could listen to this man for 20 years, he knew exactly what he was, and on some level could even agree with him on some hateful things. No one running for President of this great country should enmesh himself with such bigots and America-haters.

"You are who your friends are"
"You're known by the company you keep"

  1     March 21, 2008 - 8:00pm | TheSdog

Pathetic and shameful

are the only words to describe the mainstream media's involvement in spinning the Rev. Wright issue for Obama.

The ADN is complicit. You barely cover the original story and then drool all over the response.

  March 22, 2008 - 12:37pm | toklat2

?

I do not see in general the mainstream spinning
this issue. The mainstream media may need for complete accuracy a more definitive word as to who is.
Television a very popular today way of media news plus
easy to get close to 24 hour coverage on a daily basis.
The opinions on this Rev. Wright issue in the television
people giving their own viewpoints on the story have
varied at least somewhat with most saying the gest
of going beyond this situation to the much more important issues facing all Americans today is what we
all should be totaly more interested in. Obama if one
listened well gave a truth about the still existing but
only in some situations of this lack of trust and division
accordaing to race issues. It is evident that this division
remaining is not what Obama personally feels nor thinks
is wise for our country. One in actuality cannot be
responsible for what another person says or thinks to
a great degree if at all personally. I do not see the
word complicit as to the ADN in this issue. Only
coverage of an issue that though perhaps uncomfortable
to address for a much more unified Americans in these
times should be addressed with truth and wisedom.

  March 24, 2008 - 2:47pm | TheSdog

toklat

I think I get your point but maybe you should not have eaten that sandwich that had been sitting in the back of the fridge for a while.

Obama is trying to spin away from the dangerous rhetoric of a man he has followed for 20 years. Obama cannot expect the American public to believe he did not really have an idea about the hate being espoused by Rev. Wright. If nothing else, this brings Obama's judgement into question.

The mainstream media was dragged kicking and screaming before they covered the story at all. When they did start to cover it, it was to pretend like the speech Obama made was the second coming of MLK.

The sad reality is Obama may be a lot closer to Al Sharpton than he is to MLK. The media is being too kind in saying Obama does not necessarily believe these things. If this was a random endorsement or someone Obama had only known a short time it would be a palatable argument.

If it were the truth, Obama would have stopped going to the sermons a long time ago. His wife would also not have emulated the hate speech a few weeks ago. The pattern is obvious and to give BO a pass and not go after him for real answers is reprehensible.

The editors of the ADN should be ashamed for falling in line with this disgraceful display of media partisanship.

  March 24, 2008 - 8:21pm | KrazeeKat

Amen

Amen, amen, amen Sdog!