Inside Opinion

If you have questions about how the Daily News makes editorial decisions, this blog has the answers. Editorial page editor Matt Zencey and writers Frank Gerjevic and Rosemary Shinohara will discuss what they're working on, answer questions and ask your perspective on issues facing Alaska.


Matt Zencey

Matt Zencey joined the Daily News as an editorial writer in 1985 and was named editorial page editor in May 2007. He has won several. "Best editorial writing" awards from the Alaska Press Club and was a Nieman Fellow in Journalism at Harvard University. He lives on the west side of Anchorage, where he enjoys the best weather in town and easy access to the Coastal Trail. E-mail Matt at mzencey@adn.com

Frank Gerjevic

Frank Gerjevic has worked at the Daily News since 1978, where he's been sports editor, copy editor, reporter and columnist. He's been an editorial writer since 1998. He began his newspaper career with the Anchorage Times in 1975. E-mail Frank at fgerjevic@adn.com

Rosemary Shinohara

Rosemary Shinohara is an editorial writer who has lived most of her life in Alaska. She has spent most of her career as a reporter or editor at the Daily News. She covered construction of the Alaska oil pipeline, the Legislature, schools and urban affairs. She has also been an editor for NPR's All Things Considered, and has written for the Associated Press. E-mail Rosemary at rshinohara.com

"I dare ADN to publish this." - 5/13/2008 8:42 am

Looking to save on gas and ride the bus? - 5/12/2008 9:35 am

Joe Contraire's latest, coming soon - 5/9/2008 2:41 pm

Sarcasm? Hah! A non-fan writes in.... - 5/9/2008 11:48 am

Who's accountable for ADN editorials? - 5/7/2008 11:14 am

Talk radio: Dittoheads vs liberals - 5/7/2008 11:01 am

More info and commentary on John McCain's health care 'plan' - 5/1/2008 6:29 pm

Join the dialogue on race and diversity - 4/30/2008 4:44 pm

How can our community as a whole combat prejudice and discrimination? - 4/30/2008 4:42 pm

What can an individual do about prejudice? - 4/30/2008 4:39 pm

Prejudice here - getting better or worse? - 4/30/2008 4:37 pm

Prejudice and discrimination: How are we doing in Anchorage? - 4/30/2008 4:36 pm

Not-so elevated discourse - 4/28/2008 4:20 pm

Elevated discourse - 4/28/2008 10:44 am

Yin and Yang - 4/25/2008 6:00 pm

UAA vs UAF - 4/24/2008 3:59 pm

Arctic Power demands retraction re Liddy - 4/23/2008 6:04 pm

Airport expansion vs. Kincaid trails - 4/23/2008 10:20 am

About the First Amendment - 4/23/2008 9:52 am

Irwin rips Exxon, partners on Point Thomson - 4/22/2008 5:25 pm

Tesche heads into the sunset - 4/22/2008 4:52 pm

Good words from Leonard Pitts - 4/22/2008 3:25 pm

Mea culpa: Rating the corruption case apologies

When he announced he would plead guilty to a federal corruption charge, Jim Clark issued a lengthy apology. On a scale of 0 to 10, where zero is “my lips are moving, but I don’t believe a word of what I’m saying” and 10 is “I’m a sinner and will accept my just fate,” the apology from the guy who was Gov. Frank Murkowski’s right hand man was about a 9.

The only sour note was when he tried to explain away why he told the Anchorage Daily News that he had NOT done what he eventually admitted doing. (Basically, he claimed he was just confused, not lying.)

Otherwise Clark said all the right things and appeared to mean them. What he did was “wrong,” “unethical” and “stupid.” He said he is “sorry for what I have done to harm Alaskans’ trust in their public officials.” He apologized to Alaskans, to Gov. Murkowski’s opponents in the primary, to his boss Murkowski, to A.D.N., and to his family. He says he knows he has to pay for what he did.

How does Clark’s mea culpa compare to others from the lips and pens of others who were nabbed in Alaska’s corruption scandal?

Let’s take a look:

BILL BOBRICK: The lobbyist started apologizing privately before he was even charged, let alone making his guilty plea. He handed out apologies the way Bill Allen handed out campaign contributions. He was the Energizer Bunny of public apologizes. He apologized more often than Barack Obama uses the word “change.” The federal judge who sentenced Bobrick said he’d never seen a defendant so remorseful. On a scale of 1 to 10, Bobrick’s mea culpa is an 11.

REP. TOM ANDERSON: Tom fought his charges at trial, then turned contrite – a typical deathbed-type conversion. He told the judge at sentencing “"I accept full responsibility for the choices I've made and the damage I've done,” while his lawyer continued to make excuses for him, saying Tom never THOUGHT he was doing anything illegal. Lame.
Mea culpa rating: 2.

REP. PETE KOTT: After being convicted, he said he never did anything wrong – as a lawmaker serving in his official capacity on the House floor. Off the House floor – uh, well, yeah, all that stuff you saw on those tapes was pretty bad. For that, Kott said, “I do deeply regret and apologize.”
Mea culpa rating: 0.5.

REP. VIC KOHRING: Vic wins the prize for lamest apology by a convicted politician. After the jury rung him up, Kohring apologized to Alaskans, not for his corrupt mooching of money and favors, well-documented on tape, but for the stress and trauma of the investigation and trial. Then he accused the judge of bias and sought a new trial. Maybe Vic’s getting his PR advice from the same folks who are helping Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds with their steroid problems.
Mea culpa rating: minus 1.


login or register to post comments

  1     April 9, 2008 - 8:48pm | este

More articles like this!

This was fun to read, and reminded me that during times of adversity is when you really see the true character of people. Our elected representatives have such a feeling of entitlement they can't conceive that they would be sent to prison by the laws they help pass. They should be held to a higher standard, if anything. Let them be an example to those who want to run in the future.